Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Deliberate self-harm patients in the emergency department: who will repeat and who will not? Validation and development of clinical decision rules
  1. Katarina Bilén1,3,
  2. Sari Ponzer2,
  3. Carin Ottosson2,
  4. Maaret Castrén3,
  5. Hans Pettersson4
  1. 1Section of Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2Section of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  4. 4Section of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr Katarina Bilén, Section of Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-118 83, Sweden; katarina.bilen{at}sodersjukhuset.se

Abstract

Objectives (1) Validate an existing clinical tool for assessing risk after deliberate self-harm (DSH), Manchester Self-Harm Rule, in a new setting and new population, (2) develop a clinical decision rule based on factors associated with repeated self-harm in a Swedish population and (3) compare these rules.

Design A consecutive series of 1524 patients attending one of Scandinavia's largest emergency departments (ED) due to DSH during a 3-year period were included. Explanatory factors were collected from hospital charts and national databases. A nationwide register-based follow-up of new DSH episode or death by suicide within 6 months was used. We used logistic regression, area under the curve and classification trees to identify factors associated with repetition. To evaluate the ability of different decision rules to identify patients who will repeat DSH, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity.

Main outcome measure Repeated DSH or suicide within 6 months.

Results The cumulative incidence for patients repeating within 6 months was 20.3% (95% CI 18.0% to 22.0%). Application of Manchester Self-Harm Rule to our material yielded a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 21%. The clinical decision rule based on four factors associated with repetition in the Swedish population yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 18%.

Conclusions Application of either rules, with high sensitivity, may facilitate assessment in the ED and help focus right resources on patients at a higher risk. Irrespective of the choice of decision rule, it is difficult to separate those who will repeat from those who will not due to low specificity.

  • deliberate self
  • mental health, self harm
  • suicide
  • self harm
  • emergency department

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.