Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Patient experiences of an extended role in healthcare: comparing emergency care practitioners (ECPs) with usual providers in different emergency and urgent care settings
  1. Colin O'Keeffe,
  2. Suzanne Mason,
  3. Emma Knowles
  1. School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to Colin O'Keeffe, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK; c.okeeffe{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Abstract

Background This study compared patient experiences of care provided by emergency care practitioners (ECPs) and usual providers in different emergency and urgent care settings.

Methods A self-completed postal questionnaire study as part of a pragmatic quasi experimental trial in five paired sites with intervention (ECP) services matched with control (usual provider) services.

Results A greater percentage of ECP patients reported being very satisfied with overall care in all five pairs of sites. In three pairs, these percentage differences were statistically significant.

Conclusions Users of ECP services were more likely to be highly satisfied with overall care than usual provider patients in the study settings.

  • prehospital care
  • paramedics, extended roles
  • prehospital care, advanced practitioner

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.