Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Emergency department management of early sepsis: a national survey of emergency medicine and intensive care consultants
  1. Zoeb Jiwaji1,
  2. Shirin Brady2,
  3. Lauralyn A McIntyre3,
  4. Alasdair Gray4,
  5. Timothy S Walsh5
  1. 1Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  3. 3Department of Medicine (Division of Critical Care), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
  4. 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  5. 5University of Edinburgh, Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Timothy S Walsh, University of Edinburgh, Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK; Timothy.Walsh{at}ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is recommended for sepsis management in current guidelines, but the underpinning evidence is controversial. Clinician beliefs and the capacity to implement all recommended elements of EGDT in emergency departments (EDs) are uncertain. Our study aimed to explore self-reported management of early sepsis by Scottish emergency medicine (EM) and intensive care medicine (ICM) consultants, delineate important differences and determine the guideline recommendations rated most important and deliverable within the ED.

Methods A postal survey using a hypothetical patient with septic shock was sent to all EM and ICM consultants practising in Scotland.

Results 67% (76/114) EM and 61% (96/157) ICM consultants responded. Normal saline was preferred by EM respondents (‘always/often used’: EM 86%, ICM 23%, p<0.0001), whereas ICM respondents preferred Hartmann's solution (EM 42%, ICM 72%, p=0.0164), gelofusin (EM 10%, ICM 63%, p<0.0001) and starch (EM 0%, ICM 24%, p<0.0001). More ICM respondents indicated they used central venous pressure and invasive arterial pressure monitoring in the ED, and initiated vasopressors (EM 57%, ICM 90%, p<0.0001). More ICM consultants used specific haemoglobin transfusion triggers (48% EM, 77% ICM, p=0.0002), but marked variation in haemoglobin triggers and targets was reported. Lactate was rated the most important single resuscitation parameter by both specialties; no ED and only two ICM consultants rated ScVO2 most important.

Conclusions Differences in early fluid and vasopressor management of sepsis exist between Scottish ICM and EM consultants. Transfusion practice is highly variable, suggesting clinical uncertainty. Lactate is considered more important than ScVO2 measurement.

  • resuscitation
  • infection
  • intensive care
  • emergency care systems, emergency departments

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.