Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Outcomes and characteristics of non-immobilised, spine-injured trauma patients: a systematic review of prehospital selective immobilisation protocols
  1. Neil E McDonald1,
  2. Gwynn Curran-Sills2,
  3. Roger E Thomas2
  1. 1Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  2. 2Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Neil E McDonald, Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service, 185 King St, 2nd Floor, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3B 1J1; neil.mcdonald{at}utoronto.ca

Abstract

Objectives This review assesses prehospital selective immobilisation protocols across a range of outcomes, including neurological deterioration and characteristics of injured, non-immobilised patients.

Methods Six electronic reference databases and eight grey literature sources were systematically searched. We included studies that enrolled acute trauma patients in the prehospital setting who were assessed for spine injury according to predefined clinical criteria and either immobilised or not. Data items included instances of neurological deterioration among patients with spine injuries, as well as available characteristics of those who were injured and not immobilised. Available data and study heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. Bias was assessed for both individual studies and across studies by outcome.

Results 604 unique articles were retrieved, of which 7 met inclusion criteria. There was moderate or high risk of bias across studies in all outcomes. Of 76 patients with spine injuries who were not immobilised, 72 had no neurological deficit that appeared after emergency medical services contact, and the remaining four were not followed. Within this group, there appears to be a trend towards elderly patients who suffered a thoracic or lumbar injury from a low-risk mechanism of injury. Among studies that report both the results of the protocol assessment and immobilisation status, there is variable correspondence between the two.

Conclusions Data limitations and study biases suggest caution when interpreting and applying the results of this review. Its findings are consistent with the conclusions of individual studies. The characteristics of injured, non-immobilised patients point to areas of future research to investigate apparent trends.

  • emergency ambulance systems
  • spinal
  • Trauma, spine and pelvis
  • prehospital care
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.