Article Text

other Versions

PDF
An introduction to the Emergency Department Adult Clinical Escalation protocol: ED-ACE
  1. Eoin Coughlan1,
  2. Una Geary2,
  3. Abel Wakai3,4,
  4. Ronan O'Sullivan5,6,
  5. John Browne1,
  6. Eilish McAuliffe7,
  7. Marie Ward7,
  8. Fiona McDaid8,
  9. Conor Deasy9
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
  2. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  3. 3Emergency Care Research Unit (ECRU), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
  4. 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  5. 5School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
  6. 6Bon Secours Hospital, Cork, Ireland
  7. 7School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  8. 8Department of Emergency Medicine, Naas Hospital, Naas, Ireland
  9. 9Department of Emergency Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Eoin Coughlan, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork, T12 YN60, Ireland; eoincoughlan{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

Purpose of the study This study demonstrates how a participatory action research approach was used to address the challenge of the early and effective detection of the deteriorating patient in the ED setting. The approach enabled a systematic approach to patient monitoring and escalation of care to be developed to address the wide-ranging spectrum of undifferentiated presentations and the phases of ED care from triage to patient admission. This paper presents a longitudinal patient monitoring system, which aims to provide monitoring and escalation of care, where necessary, of adult patients from triage to admission to hospital in a manner that is feasible in the unique ED environment.

Methods An action research approach was taken to designing a longitudinal patient monitoring system appropriate for the ED. While the first draft protocol for post-triage monitoring and escalation was designed by a core research group, six clinical sites were included in iterative cycles of planning, action, reviewing and further planning. Reasons for refining the system at each site were collated and the protocol was adjusted accordingly before commencing the process at the next site.

Results The ED Adult Clinical Escalation longitudinal patient monitoring system (ED-ACE) evolved through iterative cycles of design and testing to include: (1) a monitoring chart for adult patients; (2) a standardised approach to the monitoring and reassessment of patients after triage until they are assessed by a clinician; (3) the ISBAR (I=Identify, S=Situation, B=Background, A=Assessment, R=Recommendation) tool for interprofessional communication relating to clinical escalation; (4) a template for prescribing a patient-specific monitoring plan to be used by treating clinicians to guide patient monitoring from the time the patient is assessed until when they leave the ED and (5) a protocol for clinical escalation prompted by single physiological triggers and clinical concern.

Conclusions This tool offers a link in the ‘Chain of Prevention’ between the Manchester Triage System and ward-based early warning scores taking account of the importance of standardisation, while being sufficiently adaptable for the unique working environment and patient population in the ED.

  • triage
  • emergency department
  • safety

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Twitter Follow Ronan O'Sullivan at @RonanOSull

  • Contributors EC wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors provided critical intellectual input and approved the final version.

  • Funding The Health Research Board, the Health Service Executive and the Royal College of Physicians, Ireland funded this research under the auspices of the Research Collaborative in Quality and Patient Safety Awards.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee for the Cork Teaching Hospitals (ref. ECM 4 (f) 03/02/15).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.