Article Text

PDF
Five-level emergency triage systems: variation in assessment of validity
  1. Akira Kuriyama1,2,
  2. Seigo Urushidani3,
  3. Takeo Nakayama1
  1. 1 Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
  2. 2 Department of General Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
  3. 3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Akira Kuriyama, Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida-konoe-cho Sakyo-ku Kyoto 606-8501 Japan; akira.kuriyama.jpn{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction Triage systems are scales developed to rate the degree of urgency among patients who arrive at EDs. A number of different scales are in use; however, the way in which they have been validated is inconsistent. Also, it is difficult to define a surrogate that accurately predicts urgency. This systematic review described reference standards and measures used in previous validation studies of five-level triage systems.

Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL to identify studies that had assessed the validity of five-level triage systems and described the reference standards and measures applied in these studies. Studies were divided into those using criterion validity (reference standards developed by expert panels or triage systems already in use) and those using construct validity (prognosis, costs and resource use).

Results A total of 57 studies examined criterion and construct validity of 14 five-level triage systems. Criterion validity was examined by evaluating (1) agreement between the assigned degree of urgency with objective standard criteria (12 studies), (2) overtriage and undertriage (9 studies) and (3) sensitivity and specificity of triage systems (7 studies). Construct validity was examined by looking at (4) the associations between the assigned degree of urgency and measures gauged in EDs (48 studies) and (5) the associations between the assigned degree of urgency and measures gauged after hospitalisation (13 studies). Particularly, among 46 validation studies of the most commonly used triages (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System), 13 and 39 studies examined criterion and construct validity, respectively.

Conclusion Previous studies applied various reference standards and measures to validate five-level triage systems. They either created their own reference standard or used a combination of severity/resource measures.

  • triage
  • triage systems
  • emergency departments
  • reference standards
  • measures
  • validity
  • criterion validity
  • construct validity
  • severity
  • urgency
  • systematic review.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors AK and TN conceived the study design and interpreted the data. AK and SU acquired the data. AK analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised and approved the submission of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.