Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 335, Issue 8685, 10 February 1990, Pages 330-334
The Lancet

CLINICAL PRACTICE
Audit of transfer of unconscious head-injured patients to a neurosurgical unit

https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(90)90615-CGet rights and content

Abstract

Features of patients transferred to a regional neurosurgical unit in coma after recent head injury were compared with a similar audit seven years previously. There were fewer avoidable adverse factors in the recent series, but some patients received inadequate care of the airway, while in some others major extracranial injuries were overlooked or poorly managed. Only 42% of the comatose patients had had an endotracheal tube inserted; half those in whom neither a tube nor an oral airway had been inserted were transported supine. Systemic hypoxia or hypertension were associated with a poor outcome. Even when computed tomography scanners become available in more hospitals, many patients who are unconscious after head injury will still need to be transferred to a neurosurgical unit. Detailed guidelines should be agreed locally to minimise the hazards of transfer of unconscious patients between hospitals. A rota of experienced doctors and nurses at the sending hospital should be responsible for deciding how each individual patient should be managed during transfer, according to the guidelines. Continuing audit of such cases is needed to indicate whether revision of local practice is needed.

References (24)

  • Ih Wright et al.

    Provision of facilities for secondary transport of seriously ill patients in the United Kingdom

    Br Med J

    (1988)
  • Cited by (114)

    • How do i safely transport the critically ill patient?

      2019, Evidence-Based Practice of Critical Care
    • How Do I Transport the Critically Ill Patient?

      2010, Evidence-Based Practice of Critical Care: Expert Consult: Online and Print
    • How Do I Transport the Critically Ill Patient?

      2010, Evidence-Based Practice of Critical Care
    • Intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow. A pathophysiological and clinical perspective

      2009, Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Head tilt: 30° head tilt and neutral positioning of the neck, avoiding venous obstruction, maximizes venous drainage and attenuates rises in ICP while allowing adequate cerebral perfusion.10 Blood pressure and oxygenation: hypoxia and hypotension should be avoided.11 The mean blood pressure should be maintained at >90 mmHg with fluid resuscitation and inotropes, and PaO2 should be maintained at >13.5 kPa.

    • Inter-hospital transfer of trauma patients in a developing country: A prospective descriptive study

      2008, International Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many critically ill trauma patients are often transferred to the UHWI from other institutions island wide for investigation and management. It is well known that inter-hospital patient transfer may be a hazardous process that exposes patients to numerous complications including hypoxia, hypotension, hypercarbia, convulsions, intracranial haematoma and neurological deterioration.3–5 Most countries follow existing guidelines to govern the safe transportation of injured patients6–8 but no such guidelines or referral systems exist in Jamaica, where trauma is a major public health problem.9–11

    • Intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow

      2007, Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Barbiturates have significant side effects, including hypotension secondary to reduced sympathetic tone and cardiotoxicity. Hypoxia and hypotension are associated with poor outcome in severe head injury.7 Widespread use of ICP- and CPP-driven protocols appears to have improved the outcome from traumatic brain injury, although randomized trials in this area do not exist.13,14

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text