Elsevier

The Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volume 13, Issue 2, March–April 1995, Pages 203-209
The Journal of Emergency Medicine

Comparison of three methods of gut decontamination in tricyclic antidepressant overdose

https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(94)00153-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effectiveness of three different gut decontamination methods in 51 patients presenting to an emergency department with tricyclic antidepressant overdose. Patients were randomized to three treatments; Group 1 received activated charcoal, Group 2 received saline lavage followed by activated charcoal, and Group 3 received activated charcoal followed by saline lavage followed by activated charcoal. Baseline characteristics of the three groups did not differ, including Glasgow Coma Scores, age, and mean tricyclic antidepressant levels. Average length of stay in admitted patients was 93.3 hours in Group 1, 107.2 hours in Group 2, and 66.7 hours in Group 3. Of those admitted to an ICU, average ICU time was 66.9 hours in Group 1, 54.1 hours in Group 2, and 34.4 hours in Group 3. Average duration of sinus tachycardia was 20.8 hours in Group 1, 30.8 hours in Group 2, and 32.2 hours in Group 3. Of those requiring mechanical ventilation, average ventilator time was 43.4 hours in Group 1, 24.1 hours in Group 2, and 17.8 hours in Group 3. No statistically significant difference could be shown with respect to the clinical endpoints noted. There were no deaths in any of the groups. All three methods of gut decontamination had similar clinical outcomes.

Cited by (46)

  • Fundaments of Toxicology—Approach to the Poisoned Patient

    2020, Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
    Citation Excerpt :

    The procedure is associated with diminishing recovery of ingested poison or pills with time after ingestion; lack of demonstrable clinical benefit in illness severity, recovery time, or outcome; and significant risk of aspiration and pneumonitis, laryngospasm, and perforation of the stomach or esophagus (with mediastinal emphysema).7 Although lavage has been advocated for some toxins (eg, paraquat) or drugs that slow gastrointestinal transit (eg, tricyclic antidepressants), there is no sufficient evidence of clinical benefit when compared with activated charcoal.8 The use of gastric lavage in poisoning is so rarely employed that expertise is lacking and kits are largely unavailable.

  • Management of the comatose patient

    2008, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    These patients are at high risk of complications from respiratory failure, hemodynamic collapse, cardiac arrhythmias, and seizures. Activated charcoal (1 g/kg), with or without gastric lavage, may effectively reduce drug absorption when promptly administered (Bosse et al., 1995). Mortality is closely related to cardiac toxicity caused by delayed depolarization, conduction abnormalities, and decreased myocardial contractility due to inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels.

  • The Approach to the Patient with an Unknown Overdose

    2007, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Gastric lavage is no longer indicated for most ingestions [3]. Gastric lavage may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially life-threatening amount of a toxin and presents within 1 hour of ingestion [3,74–79]. Even in this scenario, however, there is no clear evidence that its use improves clinical outcome.

  • Toxicology in the critically ill patient

    2003, Clinics in Chest Medicine
View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented in part at the Southern Medical Association Annual Meeting in San Antonio, TX, November 1992.

View full text