Elsevier

The Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volume 13, Issue 6, November–December 1995, Pages 847-855
The Journal of Emergency Medicine

Canadian perspective
Use of continuous quality improvement to facilitate patient flow through the triage and Fast-Track areas of an emergency department☆,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-4679(95)02023-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Application of Continuous Quality Improvement techniques can identify (a) major causes of delay in evaluation and treatment of ambulatory patients in an Emergency Department (ED) and (b) rational solutions to reduce those delays. To confirm this hypothesis, a prospective interventional study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital with 50,000 emergency visits per year. Participants included all patients discharged from the ED in three separate time periods. A formal continuous quality improvement process was used to document the current process of ambulatory care patient flow and prioritize the causes of delay. Solutions were defined and presented to the hospital administration. Two solutions were implemented immediately. The effect of these changes was assessed by comparing the time interval from presentation to discharge from the ED (length of stay) and the time interval from presentation to generation of a chart (chart generation). These differences were compared by analysis of variance on consecutive patients seen in a 48-hour control period and two postintervention 48-hour periods. The interventions that were identified and immediately implemented were the addition of an admission clerk and the reduction of the Fast-Track nurse function to include only patient placement and vital signs. The length of stay for all patients was significantly reduced from a mean of 163 ± 170 min to 115 ± 86 and 122 ± 105 min in two separate postintervention 48-hour samples. The mean length of stay for Fast-Track patients not requiring X-ray, electrocardiogram, or blood tests was 92 ± 46 min. After the intervention, this was reduced to 73 ± 46 and 67 ± 31 min in the same two 48-hour samples. Chart generation times were significantly reduced from a mean of 21 ± 18 min to 8 ± 6 min. We conclude that the formal application of Continuous Quality Improvement techniques in the Emergency Department can result in appropriate changes in the process of patient flow, leading to measurable and significant reductions in length of stay for Fast-Track patients.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (63)

  • Improving patient flow: The impact of consultant work pattern on trauma ward efficiency

    2011, Surgeon
    Citation Excerpt :

    Maximising departmental patient flow is critical to successful and efficient hospital operations, especially in the face of limited resources. Authors such as Dickson, Howell, Miró and Fernandes have shown that the application of ‘process management’ principles in Emergency Departments can effectively improve patient flow and thus overall efficiency.3–6 In the setting of urgent trauma surgery, Torkki et al.,7 demonstrated that the application of ‘process management’ principles can result in improved departmental efficiency.

  • Evaluating Care in ED Fast Tracks

    2011, Journal of Emergency Nursing
    Citation Excerpt :

    Role clarity referred to the understanding of the NPs' role in the emergency department, and recruitment issues referred to attracting and retaining NPs to work in the emergency department.38 A second study examined an organization's quality improvement initiatives related to identifying major causes for delay in evaluation and treatment of ambulatory patients in the emergency department and rational solutions to reduce those delays; it found that formal application of continuous quality improvement techniques in emergency departments and FTs can result in appropriate changes in the process of patient flow, leading to measurable and significant reductions in length of stay for FT patients.39 Although much has been written about patient and organizational outcomes of FTs in emergency departments, less is known about structure and process for development and implementation of an FT. For example, what are the best practices in terms of types, characteristics, and demographics of patients best evaluated and managed in FTs with a 90-minute benchmark?

  • Process improvement approaches in emergency departments: a review of the current knowledge

    2022, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management

  • Methodological approaches to support process improvement in emergency departments: A systematic review

    2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

  • The French emergency national survey: A description of emergency departments and patients in France

    2018, PLoS ONE

  • A quality improvement project to reduce waiting time for pediatric outpatient referral clinics in Singapore

    2017, Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
View all citing articles on Scopus
☆

This paper was presented in part at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine annual meeting, San Antonio, May 1995. It was also presented in part at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada annual meeting, Montreal, Canada, September 1995.

☆☆

Canadian Perspectives is coordinated by James Ducharme, md, of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) and St. John Regional Hospital, St. John, New Brunswick, Canada.

View full text
Copyright © 1995 Published by Elsevier Inc.