Pre-arrest morbidity and other correlates of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(89)80479-6Get rights and content

Purpose

Recent reports on the use of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have failed to provide an applicable method to identify patients who have little chance of surviving CPR. We prospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcome of 140 consecutive hospitalized patients who had cardiopulmonary arrest and received CPR, and we propose a method for predicting survival in this setting.

Patients and methods

The study period was July 1 through December 31, 1985, and the patient population consisted of 91 men and 49 women (age range, 18 to 92 years). We devised a multifactorial scoring system, the Pre-Arrest Morbidity (PAM) Index, to evaluate pre-arrest morbidity in individual patients.

Results

Seventy-seven (55%) of these patients were successfully resuscitated, 34 (24.3%) were discharged from the hospital alive, and 29 (20.7%) were long-term survivors (alive three months after discharge). Multivariate analysis of pre-arrest clinical variables demonstrated a significant association with mortality for hypotension, azotemia, and age 65 years or older, although none of these factors was absolutely predictive of a fatal outcome. The PAM Index was found to correlate inversely with the frequency of successful resuscitation, and the probability of short-term and long-term survival after CPR. Patients with PAM scores of 7 or greater had an extremely low likelihood of long-term survival (less than 15%), and no patient with a score of more than 8 survived to discharge. When the PAM score was considered in multivariate analysis of pre-arrest variables, it became the only significant independent predictor of mortality.

Conclusion

The PAM Index may be useful in identifying patients in whom CPR may be ineffective.

References (40)

  • GulatiRS et al.

    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of old people

    Lancet

    (1983)
  • Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC)

    JAMA

    (1986)
  • JeresatyRM et al.

    External cardiac resuscitation in a community hospital. A three-year experience

    Arch Intern Med

    (1969)
  • BedellSL et al.

    Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital

    N Engl J Med

    (1983)
  • SaphirR

    External cardiac massage: prospective analysis of 123 cases and review of the literature

    Medicine (Baltimore)

    (1968)
  • BaylissRIS

    Thou shalt not strive officiously

    Br Med J

    (1982)
  • MilesSH et al.

    The do-not-resuscitate order in a teaching hospital: considerations and a suggested policy

    Ann Intern Med

    (1982)
  • LoB et al.

    Deciding whether to resuscitate

    Arch Intern Med

    (1983)
  • WanzerSH et al.

    The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients

    N Engl J Med

    (1984)
  • SkovronML et al.

    Factors predicting survival for six months after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: multi-variate analysis of a prospective study

    Mt Sinai J Med (NY)

    (1985)
  • Cited by (212)

    • 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces

      2022, Resuscitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      The full text of this CoSTR is available on the ILCOR website.241 This review identified 23 studies242–264 investigating 13 different prearrest prediction rules for survival after IHCA. We did not conduct any meta-analyses because the included studies were all based on historical (retrospective) cohort studies and judged to have very serious risk of bias and because the evidence was considered very low certainty for all available scores.

    • Medical futility regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation in in-hospital cardiac arrests of adult patients: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

      2022, Resuscitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      We removed duplicates (n = 86) and discarded 1621 studies after screening titles and abstracts. Of the remaining 259 full-text articles, 31 studies1,4,24–52 were eligible for inclusion (Fig. 1). Table 1 lists characteristics of the 11 studies included in the meta-analysis.

    • Predicting the probability of survival with mild or moderate neurological dysfunction after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: The GO-FAR 2 score

      2020, Resuscitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Use of prognostic scoring system to predict survival after CPR based on pre-arrest variables can offer much-needed support for clinicians. However, until recently, available scoring systems have either been outdated,27,34,35 had poor accuracy across populations,13 or have been limited in applicability among those with pre-existing mild or moderate neurological dysfunction. Accordingly, a critical challenge to effective decision-making with respect to DNAR status has been the paucity of useful prognostic tools.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text