Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 36, Issue 5, January–November 1985, Pages 483-484
Clinical Radiology

A survey of accident and emergency reporting: Results and implications

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(85)80194-XGet rights and content

Surveys have shown a consistent error rate in the detection of radiographically demonstrable abnormalities by casualty officers. A high incidence of medical litigation is related to casualty departments. For these reasons, a survey of hospitals in England and Wales was carried out to determine when and whether accident and emergency radiographs are reported. The practice in 146 hospitals was analysed. It was found that two-thirds of hospitals report all radiographs within 48 h. Seven per cent of hospitals either do not report any radiographs, report only radiographs of certain areas, or delay reporting for over 1 week. It is suggested that the patients attending as many as a quarter of all hospitals as casualties are at increased risk from errors which will inevitably be recognised late, and that these errors are directly attributable to shortage of staff.

References (8)

  • SwinburneK.

    Pattern recognition for radiographers

    Lancet

    (1971)
  • AberdourK.R.

    Must radiologists do all the reporting?

    British Journal of Radiology

    (1976)
  • BermanL. et al.

    Reducing errors in the accident department: a simple method using radiographers

    British Medical Journal

    (1985)
  • BohrerS.P.

    Must radiologists do all the reporting?

    British Journal of Radiology

    (1976)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Is a radiographer led immediate reporting service for emergency department referrals a cost effective initiative?

    2013, Radiography
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite this increasing reporting capacity, and the introduction of national guidance on report turn-around times11 stating that reports for ED patients should be issued on the day of patient attendance, the timeliness of definitive ED image reports appears to be unchanged with delays in report availability of up to 10 days persisting.12 As a result, the responsibility for initial radiographic interpretation lies with the ED clinician (medical or nursing) managing the patients care, although several authors have reported concerns in relation to ED radiographic interpretation errors13–17 and the significant clinical risk that undiagnosed and misdiagnosed injuries present15,17 and their potential predisposition to long term morbidity. Failure to improve image report turnaround times in the UK has perhaps been a consequence of traditional Radiology workload organisation (typically 9 am – 5 pm Monday – Friday) which has previously precluded the implementation of immediate reporting.

  • A FROC analysis of radiographers performance in identification of distal radial fractures

    2009, European Journal of Radiography
    Citation Excerpt :

    Radiographic reports should be timely and accurate and must be filed before the patient leaves the x-ray department [18] according to the American college of Radiology and should be ‘timely and accurate’, according to the Royal College of Radiologists [19,20]. Studies show that this is frequently not the case [21,22]. Radiographers have demonstrated that they can perform to equal levels as radiologists and the current work shows the potential of radiographers untrained in image interpretation to be part of the solution [23,24].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text