An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training
Section snippets
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the 24 paramedic students at the Oslo EMS who were essential in performing this study. We would also like to thank Laerdal Medical, Norway, for providing us with the manikin system. Bjorn Auestad performed all the statistical analyses.
References (17)
- et al.
Life support first aid training of the public — review and recommendation
Resuscitation
(1999) - et al.
A peer-training model for instruction of basic cardiac life support
Resuscitation
(1995) - et al.
Randomised, controlled trial of video self-instruction versus traditional CPR training
Ann Emerg Med
(1998) - et al.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance of subjects over forty is better following half-hour video self-instruction compared to traditional four-hour classroom training
Resuscitation
(2000) - et al.
The problem of poor retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills may lie with the instructor, not the learners or the curriculum
Resuscitation
(1991) Student, instructor, and course factors predicting achievement in CPR training classes
Am J Emerg Med
(1991)- et al.
CPR instruction by videotape: results of a community project
Ann Emerg Med
(1995) - et al.
Poor correlation of mouth-to-mouth ventilation skills after basic life support training and 6 months later
Resuscitation
(1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (132)
Part 8: Education, implementation, and teams. 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations
2015, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :Meta-analysis was not possible. For the important outcome of skill performance at course conclusion, we found 28 low-quality studies (downgraded for risk of bias, imprecision, and indirectness) that demonstrated some limited improvement in CPR quality.50,191–217 Compression depth, compression rate, chest recoil, hand placement, hands-off time, and ventilation were used as markers of CPR quality.
Pump and blow isn't hit or miss: The science of BLS education
2014, Resuscitation
Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.