@article {James360, author = {Ffion James and Rosie Edwards and Nirmal James and Rhian Dyer and Victoria Goodwin}, title = {The Royal College of Emergency Medicine composite pain scale for children: level of inter-rater agreement}, volume = {34}, number = {6}, pages = {360--363}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1136/emermed-2015-205517}, publisher = {British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine}, abstract = {Objective To assess the inter-rater agreement of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) Composite Pain Scale.Methods A prospective, observational study of 117 children who presented to the ED with pain due to a limb injury. Pain severity was assessed by the triage nurse, doctor and child (depending on their age) using indicators of the RCEM Composite Pain Scale. This pain scale comprises a modified Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (FACES Scale), a Behaviour scale and a numerical rating scale (Ladder). Comparisons were made between scores from individual scales and raters.Results 117 children (26 aged 0{\textendash}8 years (group 1) and 91 aged \>8{\textendash}16 years (group 2)) were enrolled in the study. Pain in group 1 was assessed by the nurse and doctor using the FACES Scale and the Behaviour scale. The FACES Scale demonstrated greater inter-rater agreement than the Behaviour scale. Pain in group 2 was assessed by the nurse and doctor using the Behaviour scale and by the child using the FACES Scale and Ladder. The Ladder demonstrated poor inter-rater agreement in comparison with the Behaviour Score.Conclusion The Ladder score could be omitted from this composite tool as it has poor inter-rater agreement in comparison with the other indicators.}, issn = {1472-0205}, URL = {https://emj.bmj.com/content/34/6/360}, eprint = {https://emj.bmj.com/content/34/6/360.full.pdf}, journal = {Emergency Medicine Journal} }