Table 3
Author, date and countryPatient groupStudy type (level of evidence)OutcomesKey resultsStudy weaknesses
Underhill TJ et al, 1990, UK160 patients who had taken 5 g or more of paracetamol within 4 hours of attendance.RCTPlasma concentrations at 0, 60, 90 and 150 minutes post treatmentActivated charcoal group had significantly better fall in paracetamol concentration at 150 minSmall study
Gastric lavage (14) v ipecacuana (21) v activated charcoal (20) v nothing (5)
Spilller HA et al, 1994, USA2122 patients with paracetamol overdose within the previous 12 hours.Observational studyHepatotoxicity (defined as SGOT over 125 units/l)Significantly less (5% v 20%) in groups receiving activated charcoalSpectrum is of patients contacting a poisons centre. No power study.
Activated charcoal (40) v activated charcoal and N acetylcysteine (57) v activated charcoal and high dose N acetyl cysteine (25)
Buckley NA et al, 1999, Australia3981 consecutive paracetamol poisonings.Observational studyRisk of “high risk” concentrationSignificantly less change of toxic level if activated charcoal given (odds ratio 0.36 {0.23–0.58})
Gastric lavage and charcoal v charcoal alone v nothing