Table 2
Author, date,and countryPatient groupStudy type (level of evidence)OutcomesKey resultsStudy weaknesses
EM, emergency medicine (physician); A, anaesthetist.
Taryle DAet al, 1979,USA43 intubations in emergency departmentProspective observational studyGrade intubatingEM = 23/A = 20Observational study, small numbers; no comparison of specific complications or attempts by specialty; numbers do not add up
Complications by specialty (prolonged attempt/aspiration/mainstem bronchus/pneumothorax)EM = 20/23 v A = 14/23 (p = NS)
Dufour DGet al, 1995,Canada219 RSIs, including children done in emergency department by emergency physiciansRetrospective observational studyComplications:Observational study; no comparison by grade; no other specialty involved with which to compare; no mention of attempts made
 Hypotension24 (10.96%)
 Aspiration3 (1.37%)
 Bradycardia3 (1.37%)
 Bigeminy2 (0.91%)
(no failed intubations)
Sakles JCet al, 1997,USA610 intubations, including children, 515 (89.9%) had RSIsProspective observational studyIntubations by specialtyEM = 569 (93.3%)/A = 18 (3%)/Other = 23 (3.8%)Observational study; no mention of attempts made; no comparison by specialty of success or complications
Intubation by grade:
 EMR-1 (yr 1)15 (2.6%)
 EMR-2 (yr 2)101 (17.8%)
 EMR-3 (yr 3)418 (73.5%)
Specialists35 (6.2%)
Complications:
 Cardiac arrest3 (0.5%)
 Dental trauma3 (0.5%)
 Desaturation20 (3.3%)
 Hypotension3 (0.5%)
 Mainstem intubation18 (3%)
 Pneumothorax
 Vomiting10 (1.6%)
 Total57 (9.3%)
Omert Let al, 2001,USA200 trauma intubations, 101 anaesthetics in charge (A), 99 emergency medicine in charge (EM)Prospective observational studyDemographicsA =  higher GCS and RTS p<0.001)Observational study, no power study; many of the A group intubations were actually carried out by EM residents but no record of numbers; small numbers (*figures confusing for EM staff v EM residents (∼SHO) “EM staff then intubated 6/7 that the EM residents failed”; anaesthetists intubated 6 of the EM group)
Intubation success within 3 attemptsA = 98%/EM = 87.9%*
First attemptA = 77.2%/EM = 73.7%
Complication rates (%):A/EM
 Hypoxia14.9/18.2
 Aspiration5/0.1
 Mainstem intubation5.9/2
 Bradycardia2/3
 Oesophageal intubation7.9/6.7
 Dental trauma0/2
 Surgical airway2/0
 Total (no fatalities)37.6/33.3
Butler JMet al, 2001,UK60 RSIs in A&E, 4 aged under 10Prospective observational studySpecialty of decision makerA = 16 (26%)/EM = 44 (73%)Observational study; no power study; small numbers; no comparison of complications by group
Specialty of RSI practitionerA = 35 (58%)/EM = 16 (26%)
Complications: 3 cases  = A,3 unrecorded
 Desaturation2
 Hypotension3
 Cardiac arrest1
Mean speed to RSIA = 5:42min/EM = 3:52min (p = 0.17)
RSI practitioner arrival within 5 minA = 51%/EM = 62%
Tam AYet al, 2001,Hong Kong214 patients requiring intubation in the emergency department (87 in cardiac arrest) including 5 childrenProspective observational studySuccess rate:Observational study; no power study; no direct comparison between specialties; included paediatric patients; also included non-RSI cardiac arrest patients; small numbers
 Emergency physicians207/214 (97%) 90% on first attempt
 Anaesthetists (after failed by EM)7/214 (3.3%)
RSI complications (none fatal):
 Detected oesophageal intubation8/66 (12%)
 Dental trauma
 Soft tissue injury6/66 (9%)
 Bronchial intubation1/66 (1.5%)
 Desaturation <90%,2/66 (3%)
 Hypotension <90 mmHg2/66 (3%)
 Arrhythmia1/66 (1.5%)
Wong Eet al, 2003,Singapore142 trauma casesRetrospective observational studyNumber of attempts (10 not attempted)113/132 (85.6%) first attemptRetrospective observational study; no direct comparison between specialties; small numbers
129 (97.7%) successful
Anaesthetist called (potentially difficult airway)13 (9.2%)
Complications:
 Nil109 (76.8%)
 Hypotension27 (19%)
 Other6 (4.2%)
Wong Eet al, 2003,Southeast Asia1068 emergency department patients requiring advanced airway management (including cardiac arrests)Prospective observational studySpecialty v success rate, anaesthetist (A) 16, emergency physician (EP)(equivalent SpR grade or above) 658, medical officer (MO) 392Observational study; no power study; no breakdown of complications by clinician; not primarily comparing clinician types; large difference in numbers between groups;, also included non-RSI cardiac arrest patients
First attemptA = 87.5%
EP = 93.1%
MO = 85.2%
Final success rateA = 100%
EP =  97.3%
MO = 90.5%
Levitan RMet al, 2004,USA658 trauma patientsProspective observational studyNumber of laryngoscopy attempts:Observational study; no power study; only major complications; self reported; More numbers in EM groups
 1EM = 394/456 (86.4%)
A = 174/194 (89.7%)
 2EM = 50 (11%)
A = 13 (6.7%)
 3EM = 12 (2.6%)
A = 7 (3.6%)
SuccessEM = 454/456 (99.6%)
A = 194/194 (100%)
CricothyrotomyEM = 2/456 (0.4%)
A = 0
NA 34.2%
(No failed intubations in any groups)M 49.3%
(p = 0.23)
Bushra JSet al, 2004,USA673 trauma patients emergency department, 467 anaesthesia supervised intubations (A), 206 emergency medicine supervised (EM)Prospective observational studySuccessful intubations within 2 attemptsA = 442/467 (94.6%)Observational study; no power study; no mention of complications; different numbers between groups (EM performed most of the intubations and reported EM intubated in 81% of anaesthesia supervised groups and in 98% of EM supervised groups)
EM = 196 (95.1%), odds ratio 1.109
Intubation failureA = 16/467 (3.4%)
EM = 4 (1.9%), odds ratio 0.558
Graham CAet al, 2004,UK396 trauma patients in emergency departmentProspective observational studyComplications (oesophageal intubation, endobronchial intubation, aspiration, vomit, critical desaturation, cardiac arrest, hypotensive episode)EP 11/110 (10.0%)Observational study; no power study
A = 13/123 (10.6%)
p = 1.0
Reid Cet al, 2004,UK208 RSIs outside theatre, 51 by anaesthetists (A), 82 by non-anaesthetists (NA), 75 by non-anaesthetists supervised by anaesthetists (M)Prospective observational studyComplications (hypotension, arrhythmias, and hypoxia)A 33.3%Observational study; no power study; no record of duration of hypoxia/hypotension; no comparison of seniority of operator; other complications not included. (When compared with conditions and expected complication rates, no statistical differences between groups)
NA 34.2%
(No failed intubations in any groups)M 49.3%
(p = 0.23)