Sensitivity and specificity of BIS monitoring for predicting poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest
| Study | TP | TN | FP | FN | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | Cut-off BIS value used in study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leary 2010 | 4 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 0.67 (0.22–0.96) | 0.85 (0.62–0.97) | 23 |
| Seder 2009 | 43 | 31 | 2 | 7 | 0.86 (0.73–0.94) | 0.94 (0.80–0.99) | 22 |
| Selig 2014 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 0.86 (0.42–1.00) | 0.89 (0.67–0.99) | 40 |
| Shibata 2005 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 0.45 (0.27–0.64) | 1.00 (0.77–1.00) | 40 |
| Stammet 2009 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.50 (0.12–0.88) | 1.00 (0.29–1.00) | 0 |
| POOLED RESULTS | 0.70 (0.49–0.85) | 0.93 (0.83–0.97) |
TP, true positives; TN, true negatives; FP, false positives; FN, false negatives.