Table 3

Accuracy of weight estimation methods

Bland-Altman analysisPercentage of estimates lying within x% of actual weight
Age (years)nBias (%)LOA (%)Within 10%Within 20%Within 30%
Method A
 All ages90190.9−25.9 to 27.658.686.895.4
 1–5.9116911.2−23.1 to 45.437.263.778.8
 6–10.99612.5−32.5 to 37.438.670.390.2
 11–15.9843−2.3−27 to 22.463.090.798.0
 16+6046−1−22.5 to 20.665.293.399.0
Method B
 All ages90190.8−25.4 to 27.160.387.795.4
 1–5.9116911.3−22.8 to 45.536.962.478.0
 6–10.99612.6−32.1 to 37.438.971.189.4
 11–15.9843−2.3−27.1 to 22.565.090.598.0
 16+6046−1−21.6 to 19.567.594.999.3
Method C
 All ages90220.4−28.4 to 29.357.785.894.7
 1–5.911696−44.5 to 56.529.753.972.8
 6–10.99614.4−28.3 to 37.142.471.990.5
 11–15.9843−2.5−25.7 to 20.763.191.998.6
 16+6049−0.8−22.4 to 20.764.893.499.1
Method D
 All ages90221.3−29.5 to 32.156.684.794.1
 1–5.911690.8−57.4 to 5928.554.171.7
 6–10.99614−31.5 to 39.541.269.588.3
 11–15.9843−1.2−25.3 to 2363.591.398.5
 16+60491.4−20.4 to 23.163.592.198.7
  • All results are in percentage and rounded to one decimal place. See text for description of methods A–D. Bland-Altman bias is positive if the method overestimates.

  • LOA, limits of agreement.