Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly useful in the evaluation of musculoskeletal problems, including those of the wrist. In patients with a wrist injury, MRI is used mainly to assess vascularity of scaphoid non-union. However, the use of MRI in patients in the acute phase following carpal injury is not common. Three-phase bone scintigraphy is routinely performed from at least 72 h after injury in patients with suspected scaphoid fracture and negative initial radiographs. We evaluated MRI in this patient group. The bone scan was used as the reference method. Nineteen patients were included. Bone scintigraphy was performed in all 19 patients, but MRI could be obtained in only 16 (in three patients, MRI was stopped owing to claustrophobia). In five patients, MRI confirmed a scintigraphically suspected scaphoid fracture. In one patient, a perilunar luxation, without a fracture, was seen on MRI, while bone scintigraphy showed a hot spot in the region of the lunate bone, suspected for fracture. This was confirmed by surgery. In two patients, a hot spot in the scaphoid region was suspected for scaphoid fracture, and immobilization and employed for a period of 12 weeks. MRI was negative in both cases; in one of them a scaphoid fracture was retrospectively proven on the initial X-ray series. In another two patients, a hot spot in the region of MCP I was found with a negative MRI. In both, the therapy was adjusted. In the remaining six patients, both modalities were negative. We conclude that in the diagnostic management of patients with suspected scaphoid fracture and negative initial radiographs, the use of MRI may be promising, but is not superior to three-phase bone scintigraphy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayfield JK, Gilula LA, Tony WG. Multiple carpal fractures. In: Gilula LA, ed.The traumatized hand and wrist. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991; 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mayfield JK, Gilula LA, Totty WG. Carpal fracture-dislocations. In: Gilula LA, ed.The traumatized hand and wrist. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991: 287–314.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tiel-van Buul MMC, Bos KE, Dijkstra PF, van Beek EJR. Broekhuizen AH. Carpal instability, the missed diagnosis in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture. Injury 1993; 24: 257–262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn AW. Fractures and dislocations of the carpus.Surg Clin North Am 1972; 52: 1513–1520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gelberman RH, Gross MS. The vascularity of the wrist.Clin Orthop 1986; 202: 40–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eddeland A, Eiken O, Hellgren E, Ohlsson N. Fractures of the scaphoid.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 9: 234–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Langhoff O, Andersen JL. Consequences of late immobilization of scaphoid fractures.J Hand Surg [Br] 1988; 13: 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tiel-van Buul MMC, van Beek EJR, Borm JJJ, Gubler FM, Broekhuizen AH, van Royen EA. The value of radiographs and bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fracture — a statistical analysis. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18: 403–406.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duncan DS, Thurston AJ. Clinical fracture of the carpal scaphoid — an illusionary diagnosis.J Hand Surg [Br] 1985; 10: 375–377.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langer Andersen J, Gron P, Langhoff O. The scaphoid fat stripe in the diagnosis of carpal trauma.Acta Radiol 1988; 29: 97–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tiel-van Buul MMC, van Beek EJR, Broekhuizen AH, Nooitgedacht EA, Davids PHP, Bakker AJ. Diagnosing scaphoid fractures: radiographs cannot be used as a gold standard.Injury 1992; 23: 77–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganel A, Engel J, Oster Z, Farine I. Bone scanning in the assessment of fractures of the scaphoid.J Hand Surg 1979; 4: 540–543.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rolfe EB, Garvie NW, Kahn MA, Ackery DM. Isotope bone imaging in suspected scaphoid trauma.Br J Radiol 1981; 54: 762–767.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiel-van Buul MMC, van Beek EJR, van Dongen A, van Royen EA. The reliability of the 3-phase bone scan in suspected scaphoid fracture — an inter- and intea-observer variability analysis.Eur J Nucl Med 1992; 19: 848–852.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johansson L, Mattson S, Nosslin B. Effective dose equivalent from radiopharmaceuticals.Eur J Nucl Med 1984; 9: 485–489.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weber J, Rasmussen CE.Stralingsbescherming. Delft: Delftse Uitgevers Maatschappij bv, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tiel-van Buul van Beek FJR, Broekhuizen AH, Bakker AJ, Bos KE, van Royen EA. A long-term study in 160 patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture — choice of diagnostic procedure.J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993; 75: 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zlatkin MB, Chao PC, Osterman AL, Mitchell DS, Dalinka MK, Kressel HY. Chronic wrist pain: evaluation with high resolution MR imaging.Radiology 1989; 173: 723–729.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dalinka MK, Meyer S, Kricun ME, Vanel D. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist.Hand Clin 1991; 7: 87–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deutsch AL, Mink JH, Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance imaging of injuries to bone and articular cartilage. Emphasis on radiographically occult abnormalities.Orthop Rev 1990; 19: 66–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitzgerald RH, Berquist TH. Editorial. Magnetic resonance imaging.J Bone Jt Surg [Am] 1986; 68: 799–801.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perlik PC, Guilford WB. Magnetic resonance imaging to assess vascularity of scaphoid nonunions.J Hand Surg [Am] 1991 ; 16: 479–484.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cristiani G, Cerofolini E, Squarzina PB, Zanasi S, Leoni A, Romagnoli R, Caroli AJ. Evaluation of ischaemic necrosis of carpal bones by magnetic resonance.J Hand Surg [Br] 1990; 15: 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Trumble TE. Avascular necrosis after scaphoid fracture: a correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and histology.J Hand Surg [Am] 1990; 15: 557–564.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Desser TS, McCarthy S, Trumble T. Scaphoid fractures and Kienbock's disease of the lunate: MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8: 357–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Emmett JE. A review and analysis of 11000 fractures seen in a private practice of orthopaedic surgery.J Bone Jt Surg [Am] 1958; 40: 1169–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brismar J. Skeletal scintigraphy of the wrist in suggested scaphoid fracture.Acta Radiol 1988; 29: 101–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Avrahami E. Panic attacks during MR-imaging.Am J Neuroradiol 1990; 11: 833–835.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kilborn LC, Labbe EE. MRI scanning procedures, development of phobic response.J Behav Med 1990; 13: 339–401.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Oberstein A, Meves M, Bockenheimer S, Schlaps D. Beeintrdchtigende Faktoren in der MR-Routineanwendung-Ergebnisse der „Multicenterstudie zur Evaluierung der Kernspintomographie”.Digit Bilddiagn 1990; 10: 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dantendorfer K, Wimberger D, Katschni H, Imhoff. H. Claustrophobia in MRI scanners.Lancet 1991; 331: 761–762.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tiel-van Buul MMC, Roolker W. Verbeeten BWB, Broekhuizen AH. Magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fracture.Eur J Nucl Med 1993; 20: 899.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    M. M. C. Tiel-van Buul & W. Roolker

  2. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    B. W. B. Verbeeten Jr

  3. Department of Traumatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    A. H. Broekhuizen

Authors
  1. M. M. C. Tiel-van Buul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Roolker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. W. B. Verbeeten Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. H. Broekhuizen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiel-van Buul, M.M.C., Roolker, W., Verbeeten, B.W.B. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fracture. Eur J Nucl Med 23, 971–975 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01084373

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01084373

Key words

Search

Navigation