Scientific paper
Are blood cultures effective in the evaluation of fever in perioperative patients?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(91)90121-SGet rights and content

Abstract

Blood cultures are routinely performed as part of the evaluation of fever in the perioperative period. Results of 364 blood culture vials representing 108 consecutive febrile events (temperature greater than or equal to 101.5 °F) in 72 patients on adult surgical services without evidence of sepsis in a metropolitan hospital were prospectively studied. Eighty-nine percent of patients had undergone an operation prior to the febrile episode. Microorganisms were isolated in blood culture vials from 9 of 108 patient febrile events. Of these blood cultures, five were positive (contained pathogens), and four represented contaminants. Two of five positive blood cultures occurred in patients with an identifiable source of bacteremia. The cost of processing all blood culture vials was $13,992, which amounted to $2,798 spent to identify each of the five patients with positive blood cultures. Blood culture vials were more likely to be positive if blood was drawn during postoperative days 4 through 10, as opposed to days 1 through 3, or if it was drawn from patients with factors depressing immune function or who had indwelling devices. Neither the magnitude of the absolute leukocyte count nor the maximum temperature at the time of phlebotomy predicted a positive blood culture. The use of resin vials produced sterile cultures in the 10 vials submitted. In no case did a positive blood culture have a measurable effect on reducing patient morbidity or mortality.

References (12)

  • DM Bell et al.

    Unreliability of fever and leukocytosis in the diagnosis of infection after cardiac valve surgery

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1978)
  • HM Krumholz et al.

    Blood culture phlebotomy: switching needles does not prevent contamination

    Ann Intern Med

    (1990)
  • MD Aronson et al.

    Blood cultures

    Ann Intern Med

    (1987)
  • MS Kramer et al.

    Should blood cultures be obtained in the evaluation of young children without an evident focus of bacterial infection?

    Pediatrics

    (1989)
  • J Freischlag et al.

    The value of postoperative fever evaluation

    Surgery

    (1983)
  • HJ Makadon et al.

    House officer's use of blood cultures

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1987)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (35)

  • Early postoperative fever workup in children: utilization and utility

    2018, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Kiragu et al. reported similar results in their retrospective review of postoperative patients in the PICU, where only 1 of 177 cases were found to have clinically significant bacteremia [14]. Similar findings are reported in the adult literature, with 15–45% of patients with early postoperative fever having blood cultures drawn, but only 0–3% of patients having positive results [15,16]. Other concerns related to blood cultures include the high incidence of specimen contamination as well as inadequate specimen volume resulting in decreased testing sensitivity.

  • Early postoperative fever and the "routine" fever work-up: Results of a prospective study

    2011, Journal of Surgical Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Blood cultures have similarly been found unhelpful during the early postoperative period. Theuer and colleagues [16] evaluated 108 sets of blood cultures from 72 febrile patients, and found five positive results, but none of them in patients febrile during the first 72 h postop. In the other studies described previously, blood cultures were positive 0%–5% of the time, and only one study [6] reported a positive blood culture in a patient febrile during the first 3 d postop.

  • Fever during anaesthesia

    2003, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology
  • Optimizing the use of blood cultures in the febrile postoperative patient

    2002, Journal of the American College of Surgeons
View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Surgical Congress, Las Vegas, Nevada, April 21–24, 1991.

1

From the Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.

View full text