Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 339, Issue 8788, 1 February 1992, Pages 257-261
The Lancet

ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Risk of strut fracture of Björk-Shiley valves

https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)91328-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The incidence of and factors that predispose to outlet strut fracture of Björk-Shiley heart valves are still not known. To obtain such information a retrospective cohort study was conducted on all 2303 patients in the Netherlands with a 60° convexo-concave (60°CC) or a 70° convexo-concave (70°CC) Björk-Shiley heart valve. Patients have been followed-up for a mean of 6·6 years (range 1-4271 days). 42 cases of mechanical failure due to outlet strut fracture have been recorded—6 of the 7 patients with fracture of the aortic valve died, as did 18 of the 35 patients with fracture of the mitral valve. Multivariate analysis identified wide opening angle (70°), large valve size (≥29 mm diameter), and young age (<50 years) as risk factors for outlet strut fracture. For large 70°CC mitral valves the cumulative risk of outlet strut fracture after 8 years was 17·4% (95% Cl 9·1-31·6). Unlike previous findings, this excessive risk applied to late as well as to early batches of valves. In patients with a large 60°CC mitral valve the cumulative risk after 8 years was 4·2% (95% Cl 2·7-6·5). The incidence rate of outlet strut fracture in 60°CC and 70°CC valves (aortic and mitral) was constant over time. Overall survival since implantation was better for patients with 60°CC prostheses than for those with 70°CC prostheses; the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality for patients receiving a 70°CC prosthesis was 1·5 (95% Cl 1·1-2·0). Together with the low (24%) necropsy rate, this ratio suggests that the reported incidence of strut fracture for the 70°CC valves is an underestimate. The data indicate that prophylactic replacement of 60°CC and 70°CC valves is advisable for selected groups of patients. Since the case-fatality rate is 50% for emergency replacement of faulty valves, patients suspected of Björk-Shiley heart-valve failure should be referred without delay to a cardiothoracic centre.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (90)

  • Prosthetic Aortic Valve Regurgitation: The Story of a Missing Piece in the Puzzle

    2022, JACC: Case Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    Structural valve degeneration is fairly uncommon within the first decade after surgical aortic valve replacement (≤15%), but the incidence has been reported to increase thereafter.6 Fracture of prosthetic valves has been reported with mechanical aortic valve prostheses and after transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement.7,8 However, to our knowledge, our case represents the first report of fracture of a bioprosthetic surgical valve in the aortic position with strut embolization to the systemic circulation.

  • The Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valve experience from the perspective of the supervisory panel

    2013, American Journal of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The number of fractures increased to a peak in the mid-1980s and began a steady decrease thereafter. The factors affecting risk of OSF were originally examined in a retrospective cohort study on all 2,303 Dutch patients implanted with 60° or 70° valves.13 After an average follow-up period of 6.6 years, the investigators identified 42 cases of OSF.

  • Fatigue fracture of the Björk-Shiley heart valve strut and failure diagnosis from acoustic signatures

    2010, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    In 1979, the Björk–Shiley 70° convexo-concave valve was introduced with remilling of the inlet strut of the 60° valve or with a solid design. By January 1990, 389 outlet-strut fractures of the convexo-concave valve were reported to the company [3]. Such failures can lead to catastrophic events.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text