Original contributionA comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography (CT scan) in evaluation of the hemodynamically stable patient with blunt abdominal trauma☆
References (40)
- et al.
Contributions of peritoneal lavage enzyme determinations to the management of isolated hollow visceral abdominal injuries
Ann Emerg Med
(1991) - et al.
Diagnosis of intraperitoneal extravasation of urine by peritoneal lavage
Ann Emerg Med
(1985) Computed tomography of blunt abdominal trauma
Radiol Clin North Am
(1983)- et al.
Computerized tomography in bladder rupture: diagnostic limitations
J Urol
(1987) - et al.
Computed tomography versus diagnostic peritoneal lavage: usefulness in immediate diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma
Ann Emerg Med
(1989) - et al.
Abdominal trauma
- et al.
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is superior to the clinical evaluation in blunt abdominal trauma
Am Surg
(1978) - et al.
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma
J Trauma
(1975) - et al.
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma: indications and results
Surgery
(1972) - et al.
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
Surgery
(1965)
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
Am J Surgery
(1978)
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the management of blunt abdominal trauma: a reassessment
J Trauma
(1987)
Complications in evaluating abdominal trauma: diagnostic peritoneal lavage versus computerized axial tomography
J Trauma
(1990)
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
The clinical and experimental aspects of peritoneal response to injury
Arch Surgery
(1967)
Utility of lavage alkaline phosphatase in detection of isolated small intestinal injury
Ann Emerg Med.
(1985)
Pitfalls of peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma
Surg Gynecol Obstet
(1980)
Peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma
Am J Surgery
(1973)
Current management of pelvic fractures: a combined surgical-angiographic approach to hemorrhage
South Med Journal
(1976)
Diagnostic errors with peritoneal lavage in patients with pelvic fractures
Arch Surg
(1979)
Cited by (0)
- ☆
Opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
Copyright © 1992 Published by Elsevier Inc.