Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 53, Issue 3, March 1998, Pages 177-182
Clinical Radiology

A randomized trial of spiral CT and ventilation perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80097-4Get rights and content

Purpose: To compare spiral computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (SCTA) with lung ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (VQS) as the initial investigation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).

Materials and Methods: Prospective randomized trial of 78 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Patients underwent either SCTA or lung VQS as their initial investigation for PE. Cross-over between groups meant that 50 patients received both examinations. The clinicians' assessment of overall clinical likelihood of PE was also collected.

Results: (1) It was possible to make a confident diagnosis in a significantly larger proportion of patients when SCTA was used as the initial investigation (35/39, 90%) compared with using VQS first (21/39, 54% P<0.001). The main difference between the two groups was that SCTA demonstrated lesions other than pulmonary embolism considered responsible for the patients' symptoms in 13/39 patients (33%) randomized to SCTA as the initial investigation and following a non-diagnostic VQS in 10/39 patients (25%) randomized to VQS as the initial investigation. (2) There was no difference in the prevalence or detection of PE in the two groups. SCTA demonstrated pulmonary emboli in 6/39 patients (16%) in the SCTA first group and VQS was high probability for PE in 5/39 patients (13%) in the VQS first group. SCTA detected PE in a further two patients in the VQS first group.

Conclusion: It is proposed that, where logistically feasible, SCTA should replace VQS as the initial investigation for PE in patients with an underlying cardio-respiratory disorder.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (100)

  • Negative Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Important Differential Diagnosis Considerations for Acute Dyspnea

    2015, Radiologic Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite the occasional use of D-dimer testing and the application of clinical metrics such as the Wells criteria or Geneva Score, the prevalence of PE on CTPA in most centers is usually between 10% and 20%.7–9 Although many CTPA examinations performed for dyspnea provide no explanation for the dyspnea, an alternative explanation may be seen in 25% to 67% of cases.9–14 These cases usually include congestive heart failure, pneumonia, pleural effusion, or atelectasis.

  • Pulmonary Embolism

    2012, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
  • Acute Pulmonary Embolism

    2010, Thoracic Surgery Clinics
  • Acute Pulmonary Embolism

    2010, Radiologic Clinics of North America
  • Computer Tomography for Venous Thromboembolic Disease

    2007, Radiologic Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    For years ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy occupied a central role in the diagnostic triage of potential PE patients. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, however, was nondiagnostic (giving an indeterminate or intermediate probability) for PE in 39% of cases and had a reader confidence level of 54% [12–14]. Furthermore, ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy rarely provided other cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary diagnoses other than PE that could explain symptoms in 50% to 60% of patients suspected of having PE [15].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text