Elsevier

Injury

Volume 29, Issue 1, January 1998, Pages 65-71
Injury

Paper
Survey of abdominal ultrasound and diagnostic peritoneal lavage for suspected intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00166-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Over a 3 year period all severely injured blunt trauma patients who were investigated with abdominal ultrasound examinations (AUS) or diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) to exclude intra-abdominal injury were evaluated. The ultrasound examinations were performed by radiologists in 220 severely injured patients (20 of whom also had DPL). The overall sensitivity and specificity of abdominal ultrasound were 82.7% and 99.5%, respectively. The sensitivity increased to 89.1% by repeat scanning. In comparison, 72 DPLs were performed in severely injured patients; the overall sensitivity and specificity of DPL were 82.8% and 97.2%, respectively. DPL resulted in more non-therapeutic laparotomies, 925 (36%) compared with 323 (13%) with AUS. Abdominal ultrasound is now the first line investigation at this centre for evaluation of possible intra-abdominal injury in injured patients.

References (35)

  • D. Jehle et al.

    Emergency department ultrasound in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma

    American Journal of Emergency Medicine

    (1993)
  • P.J. Bode et al.

    Ultrasound in the diagnosis of injury

    Injury

    (1996)
  • R.E. Burney et al.

    Diagnosis of isolated small bowel injury following blunt abdominal trauma

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1983)
  • J.A. Prall et al.

    Early definitive abdominal evaluation in the triage of unconscious normotensive blunt trauma patients

    J Trauma

    (1994)
  • A. Rodriguez et al.

    Recognition of intra-abdominal injuries in blunt trauma victims. A prospective study comparing physical examination with peritoneal lavage

    American Surgeon

    (1982)
  • J.F. Perry et al.

    Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma

    Surg Gynaecol Obstet

    (1970)
  • B.T. Stewart et al.

    Laparotomy for trauma in a regional centre: the effect of delay on outcome

    NZ J Surg

    (1994)
  • H.D. Root et al.

    Diagnostic peritoneal lavage

    Surgery

    (1965)
  • R.W. Dupriest et al.

    Open diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt trauma victims

    Surg Gynaecol Obstet

    (1979)
  • L.H. Engrav et al.

    Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt trauma

    J Trauma

    (1975)
  • J.P. Fryer et al.

    Diagnostic peritoneal lavage as an indicator for therapeutic surgery

    Can J Surg

    (1991)
  • A. Bilge et al.

    Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma

    Eur J Surg

    (1991)
  • A.C. Day et al.

    Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: integration with clinical information to improve diagnostic performance

    J Trauma

    (1992)
  • M.A. Rothlin et al.

    Ultrasound in blunt abdominal and thoracic trauma

    J Trauma

    (1993)
  • R. Grussner et al.

    Ultraschall und Lavage beim stumpfen Bauchtrauma polytraumatisierter patienten

    Dtsch Med Wochenschr

    (1985)
  • D.G. Jarowenko et al.

    Use of ultrasonography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma

  • The Injury Severity Score; method of describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care

    J Trauma

    (1974)
  • Cited by (28)

    • CT scan and Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage: towards a better diagnosis in the area of nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma

      2016, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      The primary issue for the use of DPL is the high rate of nontherapeutic surgical exploration. Between 25 and 36% of laparotomies performed on the basis of a positive lavage results are nontherapeutic [3,13]. Several studies proposed different criteria for DPL positivity to improve BBMI diagnosis.

    • The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of clinically occult post-traumatic small bowel perforation

      2009, Radiography
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, due to the invasive nature of the procedure there is a small risk of visceral injury and the procedure can also be difficult to perform in obese and uncooperative patients - particularly in inexperienced hands. Due to many of the above reasons and the delay that can occur awaiting microscopic analysis of DPL fluid, ultrasound has now replaced DPL as the investigation of choice in haemodynamically unstable patients.14,15 The ability of abdominal ultrasound to directly demonstrate small bowel injury is poor.

    • Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage and Laparoscopy in Evaluation of Abdominal Trauma

      2008, Current Therapy of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care
    • Multi-Detector Row CT Imaging of Blunt Abdominal Trauma

      2004, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text