Original article
Frequent attender profiles: Different clinical subgroups among frequent attender patients in primary care

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(96)00287-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Psychiatric and physical morbidity among frequently attending patients in primary care is high. However, very few efforts have been made to sort out the complex patterns of problems these patients have. We developed a clinical grouping of these patients. Our sample consisted of 67 frequent attenders. The measures included physical and psychiatric illnesses, presenting symptoms, sociodemographic data, psychosocial situation, level of distress, global functioning, experienced life satisfaction, illness attribution, and current psychiatric treatment. We identified five groups with different profiles: (1) patients with entirely physical illnesses; (2) patients with clear psychiatric illnesses; (3) crisis patients; (4) chronically somatizing patients; and (5) patients with multiple problems. The grouping was based on multidimensional operational criteria. The majority in all groups attended for solely physical illnesses or symptoms suggesting different forms of somatization. Only a few patients were undergoing any psychiatric treatment. Differences between groups were found regarding sociodemographic factors, physical illnesses, global functioning, and satisfaction.

References (28)

  • JN Westhead

    Frequent attenders in general practice: medical, psychological and social characteristics

    J Royal Coll Gen Pract

    (1985)
  • H Karlsson et al.

    Frequent attenders of Finnish public primary health care: sociodemographic characteristics and physical morbidity

    Fam Pract

    (1994)
  • H Karlsson et al.

    Are the frequent attenders of primary health care distressed?

    Scand J Prim Health Care

    (1995)
  • LJ Kirmayer et al.

    Three forms of somatization in primary care: prevalence, co-occurrence, and sociodemographic characteristics

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (1991)
  • Cited by (57)

    • The effects of patient's frequency of attendance and etiology of symptoms, on the General Practitioners wellbeing

      2021, Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thereby, the negative consequences on the physicians’ wellbeing are associated to some of the patients’ characteristics, and not only to the high number of visits. Several studies show that physicians consider that many of the FAs suffer Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS) originated in psychological distress that may coexist with chronic illnesses, psychiatric complaints, personality disorders and/or psychosocial problems (e.g. Gill & Sharpe, 1999; Karlsson, Joukamaa, Lahti, Lehtinen, & Kokki-Saarinen, 1997; Vedsted & Christensen, 2005). In the absence of a satisfactory explanation for the motive of their medical symptoms, some of the MUS patients consult frequently, causing a partial overlap between FA and MUS.

    • Frequent attenders in primary health care: A concept analysis

      2018, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      Frequent attenders have real need for treatment, but often make unnecessary visits to health care professionals for various reasons when their health condition does not objectively require attendance by health care professionals. Usually, much frequent consulting is linked to a need for health care by complaining of physical symptoms, regardless of the main cause (Karlsson et al., 1997; Jyväsjärvi et al., 1998). For some patients, the threshold for seeking care may be lowered.

    • Predictive factors for long-term sick leave and disability pension among frequent and normal attenders in primary health care over 5 years

      2007, Public Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      This group, representing 3–5% of the population, have increased morbidity for all types of medical problems,1 they have more chronic diseases,1,2 and they account for almost one-quarter of GPs’ workloads.1,3,4 FAs’ problems are often a combination of medical, social and psychological factors.5,6 From cross-sectional studies, it is known that FAs are more likely to be on long-term sick leave (SL) than normal attenders (NAs), and that many FAs finally receive a disability pension (DP).1,7

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text