Early reportsComparison of intrathoracic and intra-abdominal measurements of central venous pressure
References (19)
- et al.
Central venous catheterization in the critically ill patient
Crit Care Clin
(1992) - et al.
Short-term femoral vein catheterization
Am J Surg
(1979) - et al.
Emergency intravenous access through the femoral vein
Am Emerg Med
(1984) - et al.
Accuracy of central venous pressure monitoring in the intra-abdominal inferior vena cava: a canine study
J Pediatr
(1992) - et al.
Central venous pressure: physiological significance and clinical implications
Am Heart J
(1973) Central venous pressure monitoring
- et al.
The percutaneous common femoral vein catheter in critically injured patients
J Trauma
(1988) - et al.
Vascular access through the femoral vessels: indications and complications
J Burn Care Rehabil
(1986) - et al.
Central venous catheter insertion by central vein: safety and effectiveness for the pediatric patient
Pediatrics
(1986)
Cited by (50)
Iliac venous pressure estimates central venous pressure after laparotomy
2014, Journal of Surgical ResearchCitation Excerpt :Despite the frequency in which femoral lines are placed in acute resuscitation, the use of pressure measurements from femoral-placed lines positioned in the external or common iliac is not routinely performed. A limited number of studies have evaluated the use of iliac venous pressure (IVP) measured from femoral lines as a measure of CVP in preclinical and clinical models and demonstrated no significant difference in the pressure measurements [7–20]. However, no studies have evaluated IVPs measured from femoral lines after laparotomy.
Estimation of central venous pressure using inferior vena caval pressure from a femoral endovascular cooling catheter
2013, American Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :In a study by Joynt et al [7], which compared SVCP with IVCP recorded from catheters placed in the inferior vena cava close to the RA under electrocardiographic guidance, a mean difference between SVCP and IVCP was 0.45 mm Hg (SD, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.30-0.60 mm Hg). The mean difference determined in the present study was very similar to the value reported by Joynt et al [7]. Our study differs from the previous studies in that we enrolled postcardiac arrest patients undergoing femoral endovascular cooling.
Monitoring Devices in the Intensive Care Unit
2012, Surgical Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Pneumothorax is more common with subclavian access and is reported to occur 1% to 3% of the time. Femoral central line placement is not recommended for CVP monitoring and has the highest complication rate of any access site.21,22 A chest radiograph is needed after placement to make sure the central line is at the superior vena cava–right atria junction before accurate measurements can be made.
Arterial, Central Venous, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters
2008, Critical Care Medicine: Principles of Diagnosis and Management in the AdultAbdominal Compartment Syndrome: Clinical Aspects and Monitoring
2007, Critical Care ClinicsEffects of norepinephrine during intra-abdominal hypertension on renal blood flow in bacteremic dogs
2008, Critical Care Medicine