Original articleSusceptibility of HIV to inactivation by disinfectants and ultraviolet light
References (12)
- et al.
Assessment of chemical disinfectants against human immunodeficiency virus: overcoming the problem of cytotoxicity and the evaluation of selected actives
J Virol Methods
(1993) - et al.
Virucidal activity of disinfectants: studies with the poliovirus
J Hosp Infect
(1990) - et al.
A surface test for virucidal activity of disinfectants: preliminary study with herpes virus
J Hosp Infect
(1987) - et al.
Chemical inactivation of HIV on surfaces
BMJ
(1989) - et al.
Chemical inactivation of human immunodeficiency virus in vitro
J Virol Methods
(1992) - et al.
Lymphoid organs function as major reservoirs for human immunodeficiency virus
Cited by (25)
Efficient inactivation of pseudotyped HIV-based lentiviral vectors and infectious HIV
2020, Journal of Virological MethodsCitation Excerpt :In addition, the method of choice to detect residual infectivity is absolutely critical. While few publications used error-prone or insensitive detection methods like ELISA or RT activity (Aranda-Anzaldo et al., 1992; Druce et al., 1995; Lifson et al., 1986), which might not recapitulate the infectivity of HIV particles, others used tissue culture-based infectivity readouts to detect the efficacy of inactivating agents (Gordon et al., 1993; Martin et al., 1987; van Bueren et al., 1994). In order to detect residual infectivity, we chose tissue culture-based readouts.
Disinfection of fabrics and carpets artificially contaminated with calicivirus: relevance in institutional and healthcare centres
2006, Journal of Hospital InfectionCitation Excerpt :Therefore, methods for disinfecting carpets and fabrics contaminated with NoVs must receive high priority in an effort to control the spread of these pathogens. The carrier method of disinfectant testing used in this study has been shown to be a reliable predictor of the behaviour and activity of disinfectants in practice,24,27 while the suspension method is reported to overestimate the efficacy of the disinfectants.28,29 The present study evaluated five different disinfectants against FCV.
Comparative efficacy of ethanol and isopropanol against feline calicivirus, a norovirus surrogate
2006, American Journal of Infection ControlCitation Excerpt :In the carrier test, the surface is artificially contaminated with virus followed by its drying, whereas, in the suspension test, both disinfectant and virus remain in liquid phase while in contact. The carrier test has been reported to be a better predictor of the behavior and activity of disinfectants than the suspension method.43,46 Alcohols have been used as antiseptics for centuries against bacteria, fungi, and enveloped viruses.52,53
Inactivation of feline calicivirus, a Norwalk virus surrogate
1999, Journal of Hospital Infection4 Aldehydes as Biocides
1997, Progress in Medicinal Chemistry