Laboratory investigationUse of hypertonic saline/dextran versus lactated ringer's solution as a resuscitation fluid after uncontrolled aortic hemorrhage in anesthetized swine
References (31)
- et al.
Small volume infusion of 7.5% NaCl in 6% Dextran-70 for treatment of severe hemorrhagic shock in swine
Ann Emerg Med
(1986) - et al.
Hypertonic saline-dextran solutions for the prehospital management of traumatic hypotension
Am J Surg
(1989) - et al.
Resuscitation of conscious pigs following hemorrhage: Comparative efficacy of small-volume resuscitation with normal saline, 7.5% NaCl, 6% Dextran-70, and 7.5% NaCl in 6% Dextran-70
Circ Shock
(1989) - et al.
Hypertonic and hyperoncotic resuscitation from severe hemorrhagic shock in dogs: A comparative study
Crit Care Med
(1989) Resuscitation with 7.5% NaCl in 6% Dextran-70 during hemorrhagic shock in swine: Effects on organ blood flow
Crit Care Med
(1987)- et al.
Small-volume resuscitation with hypertonic saline dextran solution
Surgery
(1986) - et al.
3% NaCl and 7.5% NaCI/Dextran-70 in the resuscitation of severely injured patients
Ann Surg
(1987) - et al.
Use of a 7.5 NaCI/6% Dextran-70 solution in the resuscitation of injured patients in the emergency room
The cause of death in conventional land warfare: Implications for combat casualty care research
Milit Med
(1984)- et al.
Prospective randomized evaluation of antishock MAST in post-traumatic hypotension
J Trauma
(1986)
Experimental uncontrolled arterial hemorrhage
Surgery
(1966)
The effect of transfusion and of certain hemodynamic factors on the spontaneous control of arterial hemorrhage
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
(1964)
An experimental study of venous hemostasis
Surgery
(1967)
Is hypertonic saline resuscitation safe in “uncontrolled” hemorrhagic shock?
J Trauma
(1988)
Quantitative measurement of bleeding following hypertonic saline therapy in “uncontrolled” hemorrhagic shock
J Trauma
(1989)
Cited by (0)
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of authors and are not to be construed as official nor do they reflect the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense (AR 360-5).
The studies described in this report were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Committee/Animal Care and Use Committee at Letterman Army Institute of Research. The manuscript was peer-reviewed for compliance before submission for publication. In conducting the research herein, the investigators adhered to the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals,”DHEW Publication (NIH) 85-23.
Copyright © 1992 Published by Mosby, Inc.