Original contribution
Detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies by plain radiography, xerography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82483-7Get rights and content

Detection of a soft-tissue foreign body is common yet often difficult, particularly when the foreign material is not radiopaque. Various imaging modalities have been advocated for detecting foreign bodies that are not revealed by plain radiography. The abilities of plain radiography, xerography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography to detect glass, wooden, and plastic foreign bodies in an in vitro preparation are compared. While all of these imaging techniques demonstrated a glass foreign body, only ultrasonography clearly identified wooden and plastic foreign bodies.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (98)

  • Detectability of foreign body materials using X-ray, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: A phantom study

    2021, European Journal of Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Each imaging modality has different advantages and disadvantages in the detection of foreign objects, and availability also has to be considered [18]. Previous studies used various cadaver models with limitations of each study depending on the respective experimental setup [13,15,16,19–24]. To rule out any limitations based on the experimental setup, a phantom gel was used in this study, mainly focusing on the material rather than on the anatomical location.

  • The use of ultrasound guidance for foreign body removal

    2019, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting in San Diego, May 1989.

View full text