Original contributionClinical comparison of TAC anesthetic solutions with and without cocaine
References (4)
- et al.
Local anesthesia in minor lacerations: Topical TAC vs lidocaine infiltration
Ann Emerg Med
(1980) - et al.
Damage to tissue defenses by a topical anesthetic agent
Ann Emerg Med
(1982)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (47)
The use of topical anaesthesia during repair of minor lacerations in Departments of Emergency Medicine: A literature review
2009, International Emergency NursingTopical anesthetics in dermatology
2000, Journal of the American Academy of DermatologyCitation Excerpt :Bonadio and Wagner94 showed that a “half strength” TAC (0.25% tetracaine and 5.9% cocaine)105 or a combination of 11.8% cocaine and adrenaline 1:2000 provided efficacy similar to that of TAC on pediatric facial and scalp lacerations.94 Removing cocaine (a controlled substance) from TAC, Schaffer89 noted decreased analgesic efficacy. Bonadio and Wagner106 demonstrated that a gel-based formulation consisting of 11.8% cocaine and adrenaline 1:2000 with methylcellulose as an emulsifying agent decreased the risk from runoff of liquid medication onto mucosal or ocular surfaces.
Cocaine absorption after application of a viscous cocaine-containing TAC solution
1999, Annals of Emergency MedicineTopical anesthesia for pediatric lacerations: A randomized trial of lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine solution versus gel
1998, Annals of Emergency MedicineLAT (lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine) versus TAC (tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine) for topical anesthesia in face and scalp lacerations
1995, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Copyright © 1985 Published by Mosby, Inc.