Clinical Prediction of Emergency Cranial Computed Tomography Results☆,☆☆,★
Section snippets
INTRODUCTION
Many studies have evaluated the usefulness of emergency cranial computed tomography (CT) for a variety of clinical problems, including trauma, headaches, ischemia, and seizures.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 A large proportion of the scans that are obtained to evaluate these problems show no acute abnormality. Most agree, however, that it is important to maintain a low threshold for obtaining CT to avoid missing significant but clinically silent pathology.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14
Although
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cases were collected between January 14, 1992, and December 6, 1992, from a Level II emergency department that treats 26,000 patients per year and is in a major teaching hospital. In all patients for whom a head CT was requested, clinicians filled out a form before obtaining the CT. Data entered on the form included the clinical indication for the CT, the abnormality or abnormalities that the clinician suspected the scan would show, the clinician's prediction of the likelihood of finding an
RESULTS
We collected data on 550 consecutive patients who underwent cranial CT out of the ED. Fourteen cases had incomplete forms and so were excluded from analysis. We assumed a missing at random basis for the data and used the remaining cases for analysis.
Analysis of Prediction: All Cases The correlation between predicted CT results and actual CT results is given for the entire sample (Table 2). There were 123 CT scans (22.9%) with acute abnormalities and 197 CT scans (36.8%) with chronic
DISCUSSION
Our data show that clinicians' predictions of acute abnormalities on cranial CT generally coincide with the findings on the scan. Despite this fact, 29.2% of the acutely positive scans were in the remote or low prediction categories. In the sample of patients whose neurologic examinations were negative, 36.7% of the acutely positive scans were in the remote or low likelihood categories, a higher percentage than for the entire sample. This percentage increase is statistically significant (χ2, P
CONCLUSION
Although our data show a definite relationship between prediction of CT abnormality and actual CT result, it clearly is not adequately refined to allow patient selection for CT based solely on clinical impression. Previous studies have argued for the use of various algorithms to guide clinicians in choosing patients for CT.11, 12, 13, 15, 16 Others have suggested the liberal use of CT in ED patients with even minimal head trauma.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 14 To date, no study has been able to show perfect
References (24)
- et al.
High-yield criteria for urgent cranial computed tomography scans
Ann Emerg Med
(1986) Head scanning during admission through the accident and emergency department
Injury
(1983)Emergency CT head scans in traumatic and atraumatic conditions
Ann Emerg Med
(1986)- et al.
Is routine computerised axial tomography in epilepsy worth while?
Lancet
(1982) - et al.
Efficacy of "standard" seizure workup in the emergency department
Ann Emerg Med
(1986) - et al.
Emergency CT of the head: Indications and utilization
Md Med J
(1987) - et al.
The use of CT scanning to triage patients requiring admission following minimal head injury
J Trauma
(1991) - et al.
The value of computed tomographic scans in patients with low-risk head injuries
Neurosurgery
(1990) - et al.
Value of skull radiography, head computed tomographic scanning and admission for observation in cases of minor head injury
Neurosurgery
(1988) - et al.
Neurosurgical complications after apparently minor head injury
J Neurosurg
(1986)
Inadequacy of bedside clinical indicators in identifying significant intracranial injury in trauma patients
J Trauma
Value of contrast enhanced CT scanning in the non-trauma emergency room patient
Neuroradiology
Cited by (0)
- ☆
From the Department of Radiology* and the Emergency Department, Department of Internal Medicine,† Jewish Hospital, Washington University Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri.
- ☆☆
Address for reprints: William R Reinus, MD, Associate Professor, Jewish Hospital, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, 216 S Kingshighway, St Louis, Missouri 63110, 314-454-7400, Fax 314-454-5262
- ★
Reprint no. 47/1/55407