Preformatted admission charts for poisoning admissions facilitate clinical assessment and research

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(99)80049-3Get rights and content

Study objective: The assessment of patients with poisoning should include assessment of psychiatric details, the level of consciousness, and clinical features occurring in a number of Toxidromes (toxicology syndromes). To ensure these aspects were routinely covered, we introduced a preformatted chart (PFC) to record our poisoning admissions. The aim of our study was to determine whether using a PFC improved the quality, accuracy, and completeness of the data obtained from admissions with poisoning.

Methods: Clinical details recorded on patients admitted with tricyclic antidepressant, neuroleptic, or carbamazepine poisoning between 1987 and 1994 were compared according to whether a PFC was used. A large number of items of history and examination of interest in poisonings were analyzed. The reproducibility of the findings recorded on the PFCs was measured in 20 patients. Findings initially recorded on the chart in the emergency department were compared with those recorded within the next 30 minutes by a second more experienced observer who did not have reference to the initial record.

Results: There were large and statistically significant differences in the completeness of recording of neurologic examination, such as pupil size (100% versus 68%), conjugate eye movements (97% versus 35%), deep tendon reflexes (97% versus 51%), and in the percentage that were reported as having abnormal signs, such as dilated pupils (26% versus 14%), nystagmus (12% versus 5%), and hyperreflexia (19% versus 8%). In all cases, more information was recorded when a PFC was used; however, the differences were small for items such as vital signs and drugs ingested. Agreement between 2 observers for history and examination was moderate to good, with items on history and level of consciousness generally recorded with greater agreement than other examination findings, perhaps reflecting fluctuations in these signs.

Conclusion: Data collected prospectively with a PFC collects more information than can be obtained retrospectively from case records. In particular, the validity of data on clinical signs on presentation gained from retrospective chart review is questionable. Centers that are interested in collecting data on series of poisonings would benefit from using a PFC or some other systematic prospective method of data collection.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • Trends in recreational poisoning in Newcastle, Australia, between 1996 and 2013

    2016, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
    Citation Excerpt :

    Specifically, we hypothesized that young males would be most likely to present for recreational poisoning, and that alcohol would be the most common drug ingested. Data was acquired from a cohort study from 1987 to 2014 of consecutive poisoning presentations to HATS (Buckley et al., 2015, 1999). In 1996, the database underwent changes and data collection was modified.

  • Critical Aspects of Emergency Department Documentation and Communication

    2009, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Marill and colleagues24 confirmed this reimbursement improvement and added the advantage of physician satisfaction when they compared the T-System of paper templates (Emergency Services Consultants, Irving, TX) with undirected written documentation. Other studies have also shown documentation improvements in areas such as asthma,25 head injury,26 and poisonings.27 Numerous electronic versions of complaint-specific charts have also been developed,28 and they carry the same advantages and disadvantages discussed previously.

  • The toxidromes

    2006, Reanimation
  • Self-poisoning by older Australians: A cohort study

    2017, Medical Journal of Australia
    Citation Excerpt :

    HATS routinely records data for patients who present to hospital (even if the poisoning is uncomplicated) in a purpose-built database.10 A structured data collection form is used by HATS to prospectively capture information about patient demographics (age, sex), the drugs ingested, co-ingested substances, previous suicide attempts, whether the overdose was intentional or unintentional, management (including intensive care unit [ICU] admission), and complications of poisoning (hypotension, arrhythmias, ventilation requirement, death).11 At discharge, further information is collected, including hospital length of stay [LOS], and psychiatric and substance misuse diagnoses.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text