EditorialProcedural sedation terminology: Moving beyond “conscious sedation”*
References (21)
Sedation
Ann Emerg Med
(1996)Conscious sedation: time for this oxymoron to go away
J Pediatr
(2001)- et al.
The semantics of ketamine
Ann Emerg Med
(2000) - et al.
Pediatric analgesia and sedation
Ann Emerg Med
(1994) Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists
Anesthesiology
(1996)2001 Sedation and Anesthesia Care standards
Consensus conference: anesthesia and sedation in the dental office
JAMA.
(1985)Guidelines for the elective use of conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia in pediatric patients
Pediatrics
(1985)Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures
Pediatrics
(1992)- et al.
Conscious sedation for pediatric orthopaedic emergencies
Pediatr Emerg Care
(1996)
Cited by (59)
Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures Outside the Operating Room
2019, A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and ChildrenSedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures Outside the Operating Room
2018, A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and ChildrenPharmacologic Management of Patient Behavior
2016, McDonald and Avery's Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent: Tenth EditionProcedural sedation and analgesia: Auditing the practice at Steve Biko Academic Hospital Emergency Centre from May to October 2014
2015, African Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is a vital skill for any physician working in an emergency centre (EC). Previously known as conscious sedation, the term PSA in now preferred.1 It is the technique of using drugs to induce a state where a patient will tolerate noxious stimuli, while maintaining his or her own cardio-respiratory function without invasive support and monitoring.2
2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention
2011, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :The hemodynamic effects have been studied in patients undergoing high-risk PCI (552). Several small studies have addressed the clinical efficacy of the TandemHeart in high-risk patients undergoing PCI (551,553–556). In a single-center report of 68 patients undergoing high-risk PCI using either TandemHeart or Impella Recover 2.5, success rates (>90%) and vascular complications (7%) were similar (553).
- *
Reprints not available from the authors.