Chest
Volume 132, Issue 2, August 2007, Pages 515-522
Journal home page for Chest

Original Research
Chest Infections
Pneumonia Severity Index Class V Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Characteristics, Outcomes, and Value of Severity Scores

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-0306Get rights and content

Background

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with a pneumonia severity index (PSI) score in risk class V (PSI-V) is a potentially life-threatening condition, yet the majority of patients are not admitted to the ICU. The aim of this study was to characterize CAP patients in PSI-V to determine the risk factors for ICU admission and mortality, and to assess the performance of CAP severity scores in this population.

Methods

Prospective observational study including hospitalized adults with CAP in PSI-V from 1996 to 2003. Clinical and laboratory data, microbiological findings, and outcomes were recorded. The PSI score; modified American Thoracic Society (ATS) score; the confusion, urea, respiratory rate, low BP (CURB) score, and CURB plus age of ≥ 65 years score were calculated. A reduced score based on the acute illness variables contained in the PSI was also obtained.

Results

A total of 457 patients were included in the study (mean [± SD] age, 79 ± 11 years), of whom 92 (20%) were admitted to the ICU. Patients in the ward were older (mean age, 82 ± 10 vs 70 ± 10 years, respectively) and had more comorbidities. ICU patients experienced significantly more acute organ failures. The mortality rate was higher in ICU patients, but also was high for non-ICU patients (37% vs 20%, respectively; p = 0,003). A low level of consciousness (odds ratio [OR], 3.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 5) and shock (OR, 24.7; 95% CI, 14 to 44) were associated with a higher risk of death. The modified ATS severity rule had the best accuracy in predicting ICU admission and mortality.

Conclusions

Most CAP patients PSI-V were treated on a hospital ward. Those admitted to the ICU were younger and had findings of more acute illness. The PSI performed well as a mortality prediction tool but was less appropriate for guiding site-of-care decisions.

Section snippets

Study Subjects

The study was conducted in a 700-bed, tertiary care university hospital. All patients with CAP were prospectively followed from January 1996 to June 2003. CAP was defined as symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection plus new infiltrates seen on a chest radiograph and the absence of an alternative diagnosis. We included consecutively all patients classified on hospital admission as being in PSI-V (PSI index score, ≥ 130).4 Patients with a hospital admission in the previous month or those who

Baseline Characteristics

During the study period, CAP was diagnosed in 2,029 patients. Of these, 457 patients were classified as being in PSI-V with a mean (± SD) PSI of 154 ± 20 points (range, 131 to 234) points. The mean age was 79 ± 11 years (range, 33 to 102 years), and 70% of patients were men. Considering comorbidity, 277 patients (60%) had a previous diagnosis pulmonary disease, 166 patients (36%) had heart disease, 133 patients (29%) had a neurologic disorder, 115 patients (25%) had chronic renal disease, and

Discussion

This study has evaluated the profile and outcomes of patients with CAP and PSI-V in detail. Our results show that, despite a high mortality rate, only 20% of patients were admitted to the ICU. The patients treated in the ICU were younger and had less comorbidity. Mortality was high in ICU patients but was also relatively high in patients on the ward. The modified ATS severity rule had the best accuracy in predicting ICU admission and death. Finally, for the whole group of PSI-V CAP patients,

References (27)

  • MS Niederman et al.

    Community-acquired pneumonia in elderly patients

    Clin Geriatr Med

    (2003)
  • J Almirall et al.

    Prognostic factors of pneumonia requiring admission to the intensive care unit

    Chest

    (1995)
  • J Almirall et al.

    Epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a population based study

    Eur Respir J

    (2000)
  • BG Feagan et al.

    Treatment and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia at Canadian hospitals

    Can Med Assoc J

    (2000)
  • JF Guest et al.

    Community-acquired pneumonia: the annual cost to the national health service in the UK

    Eur Respir J

    (1997)
  • MJ Fine et al.

    Processes and outcomes of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the Pneumonia Patients Outcomes Research Team (PORT) cohort study

    Arch Intern Med

    (1999)
  • MJ Fine et al.

    A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia

    N Engl J Med

    (1997)
  • DC Angus et al.

    Severe community-acquired pneumonia: use of intensive care services and evaluation of American and British Thoracic Society Diagnostic criteria

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2002)
  • MS Niederman et al.

    Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2001)
  • S Ewig et al.

    Validation of predictive rules and indices of severity for community-acquired pneumonia

    Thorax

    (2004)
  • S Ewig et al.

    Severe community-acquired pneumonia: assessment of severity criteria

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1998)
  • S Ewig et al.

    Comparative validation of prognostic rules for community-acquired pneumonia in an elderly population

    Eur Respir J

    (1999)
  • British Thoracic Society

    BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults

    Thorax

    (2001)
  • Cited by (102)

    • Paediatric pneumonia in high-income countries: Defining and recognising cases at increased risk of severe disease

      2021, Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      The performance of these tests to predict ICU admission is shown in Table 2 [99]. Severity scores have been useful in recognising low risk patients safe to be managed with outpatient treatment [100] and predicting the need for ICU admission [101]. Their use has been associated with improved concordance with empiric antibiotic prescription guidelines, yet it is not clear that severity scores are helpful in guiding antibiotic choices [102].

    • Guidelines-concordant empiric antimicrobial therapy and mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation

      2017, Respiratory Investigation
      Citation Excerpt :

      After adjustment for patient backgrounds, the use of guidelines-concordant empirical combined antimicrobial therapy was independently associated with 7-day mortality. Severe CAP is well known to have poor prognosis; in-hospital mortality of patients with severe CAP admitted to the ICU has been reported to be 18–37% [9–11]. In-hospital mortality in this study was 54.6%, which is higher than that previously reported; this is because the patients included in the present study had very severe pneumonia that required mechanical ventilation at admission.

    • Illness severity scores in veterinary medicine

      2014, Small Animal Critical Care Medicine, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias grant 02/0632, and Institut de Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi i Sunyer grant 2005 SGRQ/00822, and Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red-Enfermedades Respiratorias CB 06/06/0028. Dr. Mauricio Valencia received a research fellowship grant in 2002 funded by the European Respiratory Society.

    The authors have reported to the ACCP that no significant conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article.

    View full text