Article Text

Download PDFPDF

The value of accident and emergency based physiotherapy services.
  1. C D Morris,
  2. S J Hawes
  1. Accident & Emergency Department, South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.


    OBJECTIVE--To investigate whether accident and emergency (A&E) department based physiotherapy has any advantages over its traditional counterpart in providing treatment for soft tissue injuries. METHODS--Two A&E departments were compared: hospital A had a traditional physiotherapy service, while hospital B had A&E based physiotherapy. Groups of adult patients from these two hospitals were compared over a one month period. Data on injuries, number of physiotherapy treatment sessions, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS--There were 27 referrals for physiotherapy in hospital A during the study period (1.17% of attendances) and 111 referrals in hospital B (4.03%) (P < 0.001). The waiting time for physiotherapy was significantly less at hospital B (3 v 7 d, P < 0.001) despite a far greater number of patients referred. Non-referral at the hospital with the traditional service was due to a perceived long waiting time by the referring doctors. Patients with longer waiting times were found to be less likely to attend their first appointment, and this was therefore more common in the hospital with the traditional service (39.5% v 9.8%). CONCLUSIONS--An A&E based physiotherapy service results in a greater referral rate and a shortened time between referral and first treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate and compare long terms outcomes following treatment by both types of physiotherapy service.

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.