Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The use of the spinal board after the pre-hospital phase of trauma management
  1. D Vickery
  1. Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Great Western Road, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Mr Vickery, Consultant in Accident and Emergency Medicine (davidvickery{at}


Objectives—For pre-hospital spinal immobilisation the spinal board is the established gold standard. There are concerns that its subsequent use in hospital may adversely affect patient outcome. This review examines the effect of prolonged patient immobilisation on the spinal board.

Methods—A database search of the literature and review of relevant trauma texts. Results—Complications associated with the use of the spinal board were found in five clinically relevant categories: pressure sore development; inadequacies of spinal immobilisation and support; pain and discomfort; respiratory compromise; and quality of radiological imaging.

Conclusion—The spinal board should be removed in all patients soon after arrival in accident and emergency departments, ideally after the primary survey and resuscitation phases.

  • spinal board
  • pre-hospital care
  • trauma

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.