Responses

Download PDFPDF

Emergency medicine terminology in the United Kingdom—time to follow the trend?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re: What should be clearcut has somehow been usurped
    • C Reid
    • Other Contributors:
      • L Chan
    Dear Editor

    We are delighted that our paper [1] has stimulated a response from overseas colleagues, who have shared with us some Australasian opinions.

    Whilst we agree that adopting the term 'emergency medicine' would bring us into line with international standard terminology, the fact remains that 'accident and emergency' appeals to many, and debate will continue as long as practice between and within United Kingdom...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    What should be clearcut has somehow been usurped
    Dear Editor,

    The paper on Emergency Medicine terminology by Reid and Chan [1] has stimulated me to write this letter. As an Australian emergency physician who works in a Department of Emergency Medicine, I view the debate on the naming of our specialty in the United Kingdom with some bewilderment and concern. What should be clearcut has somehow been usurped.

    In October 1991, the International Federation of Emergenc...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    It was an accident - is it an Emergency?

    Editor,

    I think readers will be interested in the fact that the Medical Council (Ireland) recently approved a petition from the practitioners to change the name of the specialty from Accident & Emergency Medicine to Emergency Medicine, in line with international practice.

    All the consultants in the specialty in this country are FFAEM.

    You might wish to know that there were misgivings from t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.