Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The problem of informed consent in emergency medicine research
  1. B A Foëx
  1. Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton
  1. Correspondence to:Mr Foëx, 21 Sunnybrow Road, Middleton, Manchester M24 4AD, UK (bfoex{at}zen.co.uk)

Abstract

The CRASH Trial (Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head injury), which started in April 1999 hopes to answer the question of whether or not there is any benefit to giving high dose corticosteroids after significant head injuries. To do this patients are randomised to receive either the standard care for head injuries, as defined by the receiving hospital, or standard care plus a 48 hour infusion of corticosteroids. This is to be started within eight hours of injury, preferably as soon as possible. As all eligible patients will have a reduced level of consciousness informed consent has been deemed unnecessary. In this review the issue of consent in human experimentation is presented with a special emphasis on the problems faced in emergency medicine research, and the way these have been tackled.

  • ethics
  • consent
  • head injury
  • corticosteroids

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding: none.

  • Conflicts of interest: the author has enrolled a number of patients in the CRASH Trial.