Download PDFPDF
Rapid sequence induction in the emergency department: a strategy for failure
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    RSI and crichothyrotomy success rates

    Dear Editor

    A paper by Mizelle et al. found that (in the USA)success rates for prehospital:
    - RSI by non physicians varied from 76%-98%
    - Crichothyrotomy by non physicians varied from 0%-4%

    Are either of these procedures carried out by non-physicians in UK?

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Failed intubation drill: a necessity

    Dear Editor

    As an anaesthetist, I read with interest the article by Carley and colleagues regarding the necessity of having a drill for failed intubation in the Emergency Department. A drill is essential and should be actively taught and practised.

    The algorithm you have developed is very similar to those used in anaesthetic practice, but I wish to highlight a few points. The use of the gum-elastic bougie...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    RSI by non-anaesthetists in the UK - lower incidence of cricothyrotomy than in the US
    • Cliff Reid, Physician
    • Other Contributors:
      • Louisa Chan

    Dear Editor

    Dr Carley and colleagues have produced invaluable and highly practical failed intubation guidelines for emergency physicians using RSI. They highlight the emergency department cricothyrotomy rate in the United States of 0.5-1.2%, and the lack of comparative United Kingdom rates, which are thought to be lower.

    As part of a prospective study of emergency airway management by intensive care doctors...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.