Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Fascicular tachycardia: uncommon or just unrecognised?
  1. C A Eynon1,
  2. L Howe1,
  3. S Firoozan2
  1. 1Department of Accident and Emergency, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  2. 2Department of Cardiological Science, John Radcliffe Hospital
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr C A Eynon, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough SL2 4HL, UK;

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Broad complex tachycardias present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the emergency physician. The majority of cases are ventricular tachycardias (VT) resulting from underlying ischaemic heart disease.1,2 Broad complex tachycardias may also occur as a result of a supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in the presence of aberrant conduction. Differentiation has important implications in terms of management and prognosis. If VT is mistakenly diagnosed as SVT with aberrant conduction and treated with calcium channel blockers, the patient is likely to become haemodynamically unstable.3 Some clinicians therefore advocate assumption that all cases of broad complex tachycardia are VT.4

Fascicular tachycardia is a distinct subgroup of idiopathic VT that may be confused with either typical VT or SVT.5,6 Although well recognised by cardiologists, there is only a single report in the emergency medicine literature.7 It is characterised by the absence of structural heart disease and classic electrocardiographic and electrophysiological features.5,8,9 Vagal manoeuvres and adenosine are ineffective in suppressing fascicular tachycardia.5,8,10 It is also unresponsive to the standard pharmacological treatments, such as lignocaine (lidocaine), used for VT associated with coronary artery disease.5,8 In contrast, it …

View Full Text