Responses

Download PDFPDF

NHS Direct: consistency of triage outcomes
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Is it the call that needs refinement of the system? NHS Direct

    Dear Editor

    Regarding the article by O’Cathain et al. [1] it was interesting to note the conflicting statements made towards the end of the paper.

    The systems of NHS Direct were identified as having poor sensitivity and specificity when dealing with the studied calls, yet at the end the paper it states that the types of low priority calls referred need refinement due to at least one-fifth may be pass...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.