Download PDFPDF

Ketamine is not a safe, effective, and appropriate technique for emergency department paediatric procedural sedation
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Ketamine marches on regardless

    Dear Editor

    Neil Morton's points are concise and thought provoking as always.[1] The withdrawal and ongoing reevaluation of the SIGN guidelines on paediatric procedural sedation were rightly welcomed as a chance to address issues which many emergency physicians felt had been overlooked. Our colleagues from Australasia and the United States are somewhat puzzled by our hesitation in adopting what is viewed by them a...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.