Responses

Download PDFPDF

A two year review of laryngeal mask use by the Warwickshire ambulance service
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    LMA use by Warwicksire ambulance service

    Dear Editor

    I was interested to read the letter by Pattinson et al [1] reviewing the use of the single-use laryngeal mask airway (LMA-Unique) over a two- year period in the ambulance service in Warwickshire. In their summary, the authors commented that their success rates for LMA insertion were similar to those reported in the literature and that the introduction of LMAs, ‘had achieved the aims that were intended’...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.