Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The NICE guidelines for the management of head injury: the view from a district hospital
  1. A M Leaman
  1. Correspondence to:
 Mr A Leaman
 Accident and Emergency Department, Princess Royal Hospital, Telford TF1 6TF, UK; caleamandoctors.org.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Compelling scientific evidence is required before implementation of new forms of health care

In June 2003 the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) issued guidance on the management of head injuries in the UK. The key features of this guidance were that the indications for computed tomography (CT) should be widened and that CT should replace skull radiography in the investigation of minor head injury. Reaction among my colleagues to these guidelines ranged from despair to disbelief.

Despair because this is yet another piece of central guidance that has been issued with little regard for its operational or financial consequences.

For example, an initial assessment of the impact of this guidance in this hospital indicates that an additional 725 CT scans will be required each year, of which about half will be performed outside office hours. Given that there is a national shortage of radiologists, is it a good idea to promote a policy that demands so much additional radiologist input?

Data issued by the National Radiological Protection …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding: none.

  • Competing interests: none declared.

Linked Articles

  • Primary Survey
    Pete Driscoll Jim Wardrope