Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Identifying and comparing risks in emergency medicine


Objectives: To identify common risk types occurring in emergency departments (EDs). To compare the risks occurring between different emergency departments.

Design: Application of a typology of risks to a database of critical incidents. Comparison of results of applying typology to group of critical incidents collected in a uniform manner in four different EDs.

Setting: EDs in two teaching hospitals and two district general hospitals in the north west of England.

Interventions: Observational study.

Main outcome measures: Types of critical incidents identified. Statistical comparisons between EDs.

Results: 816 critical incidents were classified. Patient assessment omission failures were the commonest type of failure, accounting for 291 (35.6%) of the critical incidents. Level 1 and level 2 failures accounted for 254 (31.1%) of critical incidents. Significant differences (p = 0.009) were shown between EDs when the categories of critical incidents occurring were compared. No significant differences (p = 0.336) were shown between EDs when the levels of severity of critical incidents occurring were compared.

Conclusions: Large numbers of critical incidents with potentially fatal consequences occur. The types of risks differ significantly between different EDs.

  • ED, emergency department
  • DGH, district general hospital
  • risks

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.