Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The intubating laryngeal mask airway
  1. A Steel
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr A Steel
 MAGPAS, 105 Needingworth Road, St Ives, Cambridgeshire PE27 5WF, UK; a-steeldoctors.net.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is accepted as both a rescue ventilation and a primary airway management device in both the prehospital and emergency department environments.1–3 A modified version of the LMA, the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA, LMA-Fastrach; Intavent Ltd, Reading, UK) exists, which, when combined with a modified tracheal tube, can be used for blind tracheal intubation. There is evidence that the ILMA is an effective means of maintaining ventilation and oxygenation in the prehospital,4 operating theatre,5 and emergency department6,7 environments. In addition, it has been reported to be effective in facial trauma,7 neck immobilisation,8,9 in a lateral position,10 while wearing a chemical protective hood,11 and while in a helicopter.12 Importantly, it has been shown to be effective even among inexperienced operators.6,8,13,14 A best evidence equipment review was undertaken to assess whether, when compared with a conventional LMA, the ILMA would be of use as an airway rescue device.

DESCRIPTION OF DEVICE

The ILMA is a modified version of the LMA, which, in addition to permitting ventilation, is designed to facilitate blind tracheal intubation with a tracheal tube in an obtunded or anaesthetised patient. It has a soft inflatable laryngeal mask and a rigid, anatomically curved airway tube terminating in a standard 15 mm connector and is wide enough to accept a cuffed 8 mm tracheal tube. The rigid handle permits removal and “steering” of the device in relation …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding: this work was supported by the MAGPAS Research Programme.

  • Conflicts of interest: none declared.