You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original Article
Derivation of a clinical decision rule to guide the interhospital transfer of patients with blunt traumatic brain injury
  1. C D Newgard1,
  2. J R Hedges1,
  3. J V Stone2,
  4. B Lenfesty2,
  5. B Diggs2,
  6. M Arthur2,
  7. R J Mullins2
  1. 1Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  2. 2Department of Surgery, Trauma/Critical Care Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
 Craig D Newgard
 Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code CR-114, Portland, Oregon, USA 97239-3098; newgardcohsu.edu

Abstract

Objective: To derive a clinical decision rule for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) that enables early identification of patients requiring specialised trauma care.

Methods: We collected data from 1999 through 2003 on a retrospective cohort of consecutive people aged 18–65 years with a serious head injury (AIS ⩾3), transported directly from the scene of injury, and evaluated in the ED. Information on 22 demographical, physiological, radiographic, and lab variables was collected. Resource based “high therapeutic intensity” measures occurring within 72 hours of ED arrival (the outcome measure) were identified a priori and included: neurosurgical intervention, exploratory laparotomy, intensive care interventions, or death. We used classification and regression tree analysis to derive and cross validate the decision rule.

Results: 504 consecutive trauma patients were identified as having a serious head injury: 246 (49%) required at least one of the HTI measures. Five ED variables (GCS, respiratory rate, age, temperature, and pulse rate) identified subjects requiring at least one of the HTI measures with 94% sensitivity (95% CI 91 to 97%) and 63% specificity (95% CI 57 to 69%) in the derivation sample, and 90% sensitivity and 55% specificity using cross validation.

Conclusions: This decision rule identified among a cohort of head injured patients evaluated in the ED the majority of those who urgently required specialised trauma care. The rule will require prospective validation in injured people presenting to non-tertiary care hospitals before implementation can be recommended.

  • AIS, Abbreviated Injury Scale
  • ED, emergency department
  • GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale
  • HTI, high therapeutic intensity
  • INR, international normalised ratio
  • TBI, traumatic brain injury
  • traumatic brain injury
  • decision rule

https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2004.020206

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Funding: this research was supported by grant R49/CCR-006283 from the U.S. Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

    • Competing interests: none declared

    • The Oregon Health & Science University (Portland, Oregon, USA) Institutional Review Board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent.