Responses

This article has a Reply. Please see:

Download PDFPDF

Ultrasound Guidance for Central Venous Catheter Insertion
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Cost per use of USS

    Dear Editor

    In the reponse from Chikungwa and Lim to Dunning's BET they raise concerns with the cost per use of the USS. The cost per use is stated at £10 per time. I would suggest that this could be considerably reduced were the USS be used in a variety of other situations that it is inherently suitable for ,such as the placement of arterial lines, peripheral access in the patient for whom access is a challenge b...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Critical cases direct our needs and skills

    Dear Editor

    The interest in use of ultrasonography had been increased in the last decade in the interventional procedures both in emergency and in ICU patients .. the question of {to use or not to use }is frequently asked in straight forward cases . and the fair of the suspected complication and cost benefit studies are the most frequent in this field . but the real need is in that cases in which the ultrasonog...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.