Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Detection of hypertension in the emergency department
  1. J Fleming,
  2. C Meredith,
  3. J Henry
  1. Academic Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Imperial College, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Mr J Fleming
 Academic Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, Imperial College, St Mary’s Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK; john.flemingimperial.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether an emergency department (ED) is a suitable location for the targeted screening of hypertension.

Methods: This was a prospective targeted screening study based at the ED of an inner city teaching hospital. Non-acute subjects over 18 years were recruited consecutively from the “minors” section of the ED and invited to participate. All subjects had their blood pressure measured twice. A verbal numerical pain score (PS) out of 10 using a visual analogue scale was obtained. Those with a mean systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg or a mean diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg (WHO JNC stage 1 hypertension) were invited for a subsequent follow up measurement. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects with hypertension at follow up. The secondary outcome measure was the correlation between a subject’s mid blood pressure (MBP) and their PS.

Results: In total, 765 subjects were tested, of whom 213 subjects were hypertensive at presentation (28.7%). After excluding those on anti-hypertensive medication (n = 43; 5.6%) and those who were non-UK residents (n = 44; 5.8%), 126 subjects were invited for follow up, of whom 51 subjects actually attended (40% attendance, 6.6% of study population). The MBP of those who re-attended was significantly lower than at presentation (p<0.001); 39 subjects (5% of the study population, 76.4% of those attending follow up) remained hypertensive. There was no correlation between a subject’s PS and their MBP (Pearson correlation coefficient  = −0.02). A 10/10 PS was associated with an 8.4 mmHg rise in MBP compared to the mean MBP of subjects with PS 0–9 (p<0.1). Of those originally presenting with PS>5/10, 62% still had hypertension at follow up when the painful stimulus was significantly reduced (mean PS = 0.6).

Conclusion: The ED provides an opportunity for identifying those individuals with hypertension who may otherwise remain undiagnosed. Caution is advised when diagnosing hypertension in those individuals suffering from anxiety and/or acute severe pain on presentation.

  • BHS, British Hypertension Society
  • DBP, diastolic blood pressure
  • ED, emergency department
  • GP, general practitioner
  • MBP, mid blood pressure
  • PS, pain score
  • SBP, systolic blood pressure
  • Emergency
  • hypertension
  • opportunistic
  • prevalence
  • prevention
  • screening
  • pain
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: there are no competing interests.

  • Ethics approval was granted by the St Mary’s local research ethics committee.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Primary Survey
    Jonathan Wyatt