You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 23, Issue 4
  • Response to Mucci et al’s study: “Cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department”

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letter
Response to Mucci et al’s study: “Cranial computed tomography in trauma: the accuracy of interpretation by staff in the emergency department”
  1. A Hugman,
  2. A Boyle
  1. Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 A J Hugman
 Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK; A.Hugman{at}doctors.org.uk

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.2005.032128

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We read with interest Mucci et al’s1 study of the accuracy of interpretation of cranial computed tomography (CT) scans in trauma by emergency department (ED) staff. It is a topical subject that needs exploring, but we have questions about the design of their study.

    Firstly, the study was underpowered with only 100 scans examined. The quoted sensitivity of 86.6% has too …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: none declared