Background and objectives: After an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) prehospital thrombolysis (PHT) reduces mortality compared with inhospital thrombolysis. In practice, a relatively small proportion of the total population with AMI receives PHT. This study was designed to identify the current barriers to PHT.
Methods: A retrospective practice review of 57 consecutive patients treated in or before arrival at a district general hospital emergency department. All patients received thrombolysis for an AMI.
Results: The main barriers to delivery of PHT appear to be the inclusion and exclusion criteria laid out in the ambulance service central guidelines. Despite recent widening of the inclusion criteria, 54% of patients eligible for immediate treatment on arrival in hospital either received or were eligible for PHT.
Conclusion: To increase the number of patients who are eligible for PHT these guidelines need to be revised further in line with inhospital criteria for thrombolysis.
- AMI, acute myocardial infarction
- CCU, coronary care unit
- CTN, call to needle time
- DTN, door to needle time
- ECG, electrocardiogram
- ED, emergency department
- JRCALC, Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee
- NICE, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
- PHT, prehospital thrombolysis
- prehospital thrombolysis
- practice review
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.